Can intuition be taught? YES

Amy Reinert amy.reinert at GMAIL.COM
Mon Aug 19 15:22:21 UTC 2013


As an experienced teacher of the development of intuition in a variety of
contexts, I want to offer a few points for this discussion.

Krippner described intuition as a shift in attention from observances and
interactions with every day reality to awareness of more subtle aspects of
situation, self, or environment.  His description is one of many, but one
that I find helpful when teaching intuitive development. Because intuition
is difficult to define, it is also difficult to study. Despite the fact
that when we talk to each other about intuition we tend to agree about what
intuition is, we generally do so without actually describing what it means
to us individually.  Therefore, when proof is offered that intuition is or
is not anything in particular, careful attention must be paid to the
definition of intuition stated in that particular context. There are some
good studies out there about intuition as a phenomenon, but few about it in
the ontological sense. Because it is a subjective experience, it is nearly
impossible to distinguish between intuition and desire, belief, impulse, or
attachment to particular outcomes. Worldview heavily influences this, and
such distinctions are particularly difficult among individuals who have
very little experience in accessing intuition or accepting it as a valid
way of knowing.

One of the best studies on intuition that I have read involved the use of
intuition in professional environments. It focused on the accuracy of
intuition when used solely as a decision making tool-- and allowed
participants their own perception of their individual intuition, rather
than impose a possibly limiting definition. The findings were
that individuals who were inexperienced in their profession, as well as
those who were inexperienced at utilizing intuition in decision making were
highly inaccurate (made incorrect decisions) when relying on intuition
alone. However, very experienced professionals were able to use intuition
exclusively in certain situations with a high degree of accuracy. An
example used in the study was that fire chiefs with 20+ years of experience
tended to know exactly the right moment to pull a fire crew from a building
before the building collapsed or the fire took an otherwise difficult turn.
They did this without stopping to consciously process all of the factors
influencing the situation, but rather reported that they could "feel" when
the call needed to be made.

Humans, like all animals, have ways of monitoring the environment that are
not cognitively based, and are still poorly understood. In my experience,
understanding the mechanisms of the process is not necessary for the
development of intuition as a useful skill--and this can indeed be taught.
As a most basic rule while training in the use of this skill, when
intuition, or the "gut check," differs from reason in a given situation, it
is a warning flag to step back and reassess what is known about the
situation, and to look for missing pieces of information. When this
happens, it is likely that the individual has picked up some bit of data
that is sitting there the mind, but not yet integrated into the cognitive
processes involved in action.

If anyone is going to be at the September conference and wants to take a
moment to run through or learn about some basic development skills, I would
be happy to oblige. Teaching this skill is one of my joys in life because
it is so helpful in improving professional skills, as well quality of life.

--Amy

Amy Ruzicka, Ph.D.


On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 8:17 PM, David Gordon, M.D.
<davidc.gordon at duke.edu>wrote:

>  Sandra,
>
>
>
> I am fascinated by your comment that intuition can be quickly transferred
> to others because I have regarded it as something that requires personal
> experience (as opposed to vicarious experience) to develop. By what means
> was the experience of this senior emergency medicine physician
> transferred?  Lecture? Small group discussion? Role modeling?  Is this a
> published study?
>
>
>
> Also, from your background, do you regard intuition as a general or
> situational ability - as Gloria Kuhn alluded to? I can imagine an expert
> clinician bolstering the learner's intuition for diagnosing chest pain but
> this wouldn't seem to carry over in the diagnosis of abdominal pain.
>
>
>
> -David
>
>
>   David Gordon, MD
> Assistant Clinical Professor
> Division of Emergency Medicine
> Duke University
>
>  The information in this electronic mail is sensitive, protected
> information intended only for the addressee(s). Any other person, including
> anyone who believes he/she might have received it due to an addressing
> error, is requested to notify the sender immediately by return electronic
> mail, and to delete it without further reading or retention. The
> information is not to be forwarded to or shared unless in compliance with
> Duke Medicine policies on confidentiality and/or with the approval of the
> sender.
>    ------------------------------
> *From:* Sandra Tice [sandra.tice at MIPCORP.COM]
> *Sent:* Sunday, August 18, 2013 5:30 PM
> *To:* IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG
> *Subject:* Re: [IMPROVEDX] Can intuition be taught? YES
>
>   Research has shown that intuition is not innate -- it is a learned
> skill, which means that it can be taught to others.  It is automatic
> thinking that has become a part of a physician’s unconscious mind through
> years of experience.  Automatic unconscious thinking is often called
> intuition or wisdom – the expert clinical reasoning that is required to
> accurately identify and correctly use relevant knowledge, information, data
> and cues from tacit interactions to consistently make the right judgments
> and decisions.
>
> Not only can intuition be taught but we have been capturing and
> documenting it so that it can be read, learned, improved and quickly
> transferred to others.  This has been tested in medicine by a physician
> with over 35 years of experience in emergency medicine who transferred his
> intuition to residents and medical students.  Within several days, they
> were diagnosing patients as if they had many years of experience.  Their
> average diagnostic accuracy immediately improved by roughly 20% and the
> time required to accurately diagnose a patient dropped from over 1 hour to
> less than 5 minutes.
>
>
>
> Sandra Tice
>
> Cognitive Scientist & Managing Partner
> Direct Phone: 773-975-6555
> MIP Corporation
>
> www.mipcorp.com
>
>
>
> *From:* Lorri Zipperer [mailto:Lorri at ZPM1.COM]
> *Sent:* Friday, August 16, 2013 2:06 PM
> *To:* IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG
> *Subject:* [IMPROVEDX] Can intuition be taught?
>
>
>
> Forwarded by the moderator
>
>
>
> *From:* Peggy Zuckerman [mailto:peggyzuckerman at gmail.com<peggyzuckerman at gmail.com>]
>
> *Sent:* Friday, August 16, 2013 12:26 PM
> *To:* Society to Improve Diagnosis in Medicine; John Brush
> *Subject:* Re: [IMPROVEDX] FM: Crowd Wisdom .... lack of dx error in the
> curriculum
>
> Intuition is just that.  One can learn to respond to one's intuition,
> usually by practicing doing just that.  Just asking, "Why does that still
> worry me?  What am I not getting?" etc.  We as a species learned to avoid
> being eaten by accepting that intuition, which is probably endless amounts
> of data being processed in the background.
>
> A great book to give a non-medical perspective this is "The Gift of Fear",
> which reminds us that our fear responses are often overridden by our
> socialized responses, leaving us vulnerable to danger.  We all have said
> something to the effect, "I just knew something was wrong, and didn't
> respond soon enough." This applies to avoiding the odd situation on the
> street, as well as in the medical setting.
>
> Peggy Zuckerman
>
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 11:01 AM, John Brush <jebrush at mac.com> wrote:
>
> There are others on this listserv, who are much more qualified than me to
> answer the question: "Can intuition be taught?"
> My two cents: I suspect that intuition is a form of intelligence that is
> innate, but can be shaped, honed, improved, and recalibrated. Intuition is
> a talent that can be developed through deliberate practice.
> I also think that metacognition can be taught. The goal of education in
> any domain should be to encourage students to be more thoughtful - to
> actively and critically think about what they are doing. Students need a
> vocabulary and some background to get them started, though. I think our
> goal should be to make this educational process more explicit. What are the
> core competencies of good medical reasoning, and how can we effectively,
> reliably, and efficiently teach those competencies?
> John
>
>
> On Aug 16, 2013, at 9:08 AM, Graber, Mark wrote:
>
> Garry's comments raise a very important and fundamental question in our
> field that someone out there may know the answer to. If not, add it to the
> growing list of research priorities:
>
> In the traditional paradigm, the expert evolves from years of training and
> experience, the 'right' education as Garry phrases it.  The expert becomes
> so because they've made all the errors there are to make, or have seen
> them.  The opposing view is that we can shortcut this process if we teach
> principles of metacognition, present all the cognitive biases and their
> antidotes, and teach error prevention strategies.  Robin Hogarth has a book
> "Educating Intuition" and Mark Quirk makes many of the same points in his
> "Intuition and Metacognition in Medical Education."
>
> The question boils down to whether you believe that you really CAN educate
> intuition, or do you have to acquire it the 'old fashioned' way, through
> experience.
>
> Mark Graber
>
>
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from IMPROVEDX: click the following link:
>
> http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1
>
> or send email to: IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG
>
>
>
> Moderator: Lorri Zipperer Lorri at ZPM1.com, Communication co-chair, Society
> for Improving Diagnosis in Medicine
>
> To learn more about SIDM visit:
> http://www.improvediagnosis.org/
>
>
> Save the date: Diagnostic Error in Medicine 2013. September 22-25, 2013 in
> Chicago, IL.
> http://www.dem2013.org
>
> ------------------------------
>
>
> To unsubscribe from IMPROVEDX: click the following link:
>
> http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1
>
> or send email to: IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG
>
>
>
> Moderator: Lorri Zipperer Lorri at ZPM1.com, Communication co-chair, Society
> for Improving Diagnosis in Medicine
>
> To learn more about SIDM visit:
> http://www.improvediagnosis.org/
>
>
> Save the date: Diagnostic Error in Medicine 2013. September 22-25, 2013 in
> Chicago, IL.
> http://www.dem2013.org
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
>
> To unsubscribe from IMPROVEDX: click the following link:
>
> http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1or send email to:
> IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG
>
> Moderator: Lorri Zipperer Lorri at ZPM1.com, Communication co-chair, Society
> for Improving Diagnosis in Medicine
>
> To learn more about SIDM visit:
> http://www.improvediagnosis.org/
> Save the date: Diagnostic Error in Medicine 2013. September 22-25, 2013 in
> Chicago, IL.
> http://www.dem2013.org
>








HTML Version:
URL: <../attachments/20130819/1fd3a5e6/attachment.html>


More information about the Test mailing list