gkuhn at MED.WAYNE.EDU
Sun Nov 10 20:36:47 UTC 2013
I sense and share your frustration. Please remember that in the ED we are often operating with incomplete information coupled with demands of making decisions under time constraints imposed by CMS. I know that many of us are frustrated that the concept that decisions made in the ED "clearly misdirects the whole team from what is really the correct diagnosis" implies that the team is incapable of looking at new evidence and making decisions that will put the team and the patient on the correct course. Clearly all of us within medicine need to be aware of the biases of premature closure and anchoring.
I have followed our discussions regarding 90 biases and still finding more with a sense of wonder. After reading your impressive e-mail I am convinced if we would tackle and decrease the biases of premature closure and anchoring we would be doing countless patients a true service.
Add to this concept the requirement to actually look at the tests we order and mandatory stoppage of orders after a pre agreed number of days unless renewed by a physician or midlevel provider and we could really make an impact on error rates.
I wonder if as a group we could put together a program to do just that and see if it makes an impact.
Certainly not as grand as other research but I do believe we could do this and really help patients.
From: Sanders, Alan [Alan.Sanders at SPHP.COM]
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2013 2:54 PM
To: IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG
Subject: [IMPROVEDX] antibiotic appropriatness
I have been involved intimately with two antibiotic stewardship programs for the past seven years, and it is remarkable how many inappropriate course of antimicrobials are prescribed, for days, when no infection is ever documented. Most commonly, these antimicrobials are initiated in the ED and continued on the hospital ward, often on a hospitalist service, for a “urosepsis” which never exists. This makes up a major part of our daily stewardship rounds which we do on the wards, with the charts, and EMR. Going down the wrong road with this and other diagnoses (often CAP) leads to enormous antimicrobial costs, and clearly misdirects the whole team from what is really the correct diagnosis.
Alan Sanders, MD
Chief of Medicine
St.Peter’s Hospital , Albany NY
This e-mail, including any attachments is the
property of Catholic Health East and is intended
for the sole use of the intended recipient(s).
It may contain information that is privileged and
confidential. Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are
not the intended recipient, please delete this message, and
reply to the sender regarding the error in a separate email.
To unsubscribe from IMPROVEDX: click the following link:
or send email to: IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG
Visit the searchable archives or adjust your subscription at: http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?INDEX
Moderator: Lorri Zipperer Lorri at ZPM1.com, Communication co-chair, Society for Improving Diagnosis in Medicine
To learn more about SIDM visit:
This document may include proprietary and confidential information of Wayne State University Physician Group and may only be read by those person(s) to whom it is addressed. If you have received this e-mail message in error, please notify us immediately. This document may not be reproduced, copied, distributed, published, modified or furnished to third parties, without prior written consent of Wayne State University Physician Group. Thank you.
More information about the Test