The Individual Error...

Bob Gorman bgorman at KNCELL.ORG
Wed Dec 18 19:38:44 UTC 2013


On 12/18/2013 2:17 PM, Bob Latino wrote:
>
> Is it appropriate to include in your definition of Individual 
> Error,  'near misses' where the error chain did not complete 
> and thus did not cause damage or death?
>
Sure!
I've had a few of those 'near misses' in my 72 years.
One caused me a year & a 1/2 of pure misery, which could have, 
should have
been avoided had they read my chart instead of the PDR.

But they haven't killed me - yet.

Bob


> Robert (Bob) J. Latino
>
> CEO
>
> Reliability Center, Inc., P.O. Box 1421, Hopewell, VA  23860
>
> (O) 804.458.0645  (F) 804.452.2119
>
> blatino at reliability.com <mailto:blatino at reliability.com> l 
> http://www.reliability.com <http://www.reliability.com/>__
>
> *From:*Bob Gorman [mailto:bgorman at KNCELL.ORG]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, December 17, 2013 6:48 PM
> *To:* IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG
> *Subject:* [IMPROVEDX] The Individual Error...
>
> Friends,
> The Individual Error, I define as: when a patient is treated 
> as one of a statistical group rather than the Individual they 
> are, and damage or death occurs.
>
> In many cases it's considered good medical practice to go with 
> the statistics; it certainly avoids a lot of lawsuits.
>
> Regardless of how many studies of hundreds and thousands of 
> hypothetical 'subjects', the only person to ever enter your 
> examining room is always an Individual. Their strengths, 
> weaknesses, allergies, tolerances, habits, etc. are very 
> specific to them.
>
> Let's look at an example I created to explain what I mean.
> You have 100 Individual patients who weigh 100 lbs. and you 
> have 100 Individual patients who weigh 300 lbs. The 
> statisticians would say you have 200 patients with an average 
> weight of 200 lbs. even tho you don't have a single patient 
> that weighs 200 lbs. Based on this, good medical practice 
> would prescribe medication and other procedures for a 200 lb. 
> person, for each of your 200 patients.
>
> This would guarantee that you over prescribe for 100 of your 
> patients, and under prescribe for the other 100. Absolutely NO 
> patient will receive appropriate prescribing...
>
> If you're lucky, all 200 of your patients will be slightly 
> irritated; if you're not lucky all 200 of your patients will die.
>
> What are your thoughts???
>
> Bob
>
> -- 
>
> The Individualis statistically insignificant;
> Statistics is individually insignificant!
>
> - BobGorman
> http://www.KnCell.org
> http://KnCell.org/blog <http://blog.KnCell.org>
>
> <http://www.improvediagnosis.org/>








To unsubscribe from the IMPROVEDX list, click the following link:<br>
<a href="http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1" target="_blank">http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1</a>
</p>

HTML Version:
URL: <../attachments/20131218/c701fbdd/attachment.html>


More information about the Test mailing list