Ideas on improving rates of missed/delayed diagnoses in PCP type visits.

Vic Nicholls nichollsvi2 at GMAIL.COM
Mon Jan 20 14:52:32 UTC 2014


This was another great post John.

Here is a question for doctors: if someone comes in and says I have
symptoms X, Y, and Z, and think I have diagnosis A, would the clinician
be open to think about the criteria for the diagnosis and say, it is
possible but have you explored diagnosis B or C? That would also fit
your symptoms. Lets see what other symptoms you have to narrow it down.

This would help in having confidence in the doctor, less reliance on
Oprah type diagnoses, and doesn't appear to take a lot of time.

What about something like that? Question for the professionals on here.

Victoria


On 1/19/2014 10:19 PM, John Brush wrote:
> 	I think that the emphasis on “patient-centeredness” has largely focused on therapeutic decisions, and hasn’t adequately addressed diagnostic decision making. There needs to be more engagement. There are problems on both sides of the conversation. Many patients seem to seek the illusion of certainty. Some are biased by dread or wishful thinking. It is hard to be objective when you are the patient. All doctors are patients at some point, and know that they aren’t very good at diagnosing themselves.
> 	I think it is a good idea to inform patients about the inherent uncertainty in diagnosis. I often ask patients “what do you think it is?” Sometimes I get a helpful answer. But usually, it least the question serves to get the patient thinking about the imprecision of testing and the difficulty in establishing a firm diagnosis.
> 	I think there is one other lurking problem. The malpractice environment has a priming effect that can cause doctors to view patients and their families as potential litigants. Doctors can get defensive when patients ask questions about the diagnosis. Doctors need to recognize that this is usually irrational and they need to work on getting past that priming effect. Also, unfortunately, doctors visits are often too time-pressured to have a decent in-depth conversation.
> 	There are a lot of barriers that inhibit getting patients better involved. It would be good to discuss the barriers and bring these impediments to doctor’s attention. I think the vast majority of doctors would like to learn how to better engage patients in diagnostic reasoning. I think helpful feedback and suggestions would be welcomed by virtually all physicians.
> John
>







To unsubscribe from the IMPROVEDX list, click the following link:<br>
<a href="http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1" target="_blank">http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1</a>
</p>



More information about the Test mailing list