Scribes and diagnostic error

robert bell rmsbell at ESEDONA.NET
Fri Jan 31 05:48:49 UTC 2014


Could that change as the pressure to see more patients increases?

It is the ACA that could lead to scribes if thought to be cost effective.

We are in a new era trying to catch up with the rest of the developed world!

Rob Bell, M.D., Ph.C.

On Jan 30, 2014, at 5:40 PM, Shapiro, Barbara <Barbara.Shapiro at UHHOSPITALS.ORG> wrote:

> I must be living on a different planet!  We have been using the EMR in the ambulatory care setting for a few months now, and in the inpatient setting for quite a while. I think our hospital bought the cheapest system they could find (Allscripts) and it is not very user friendly. The idea that the hospital would provide us with scribes, when we can't even get the Dragon to work with our system, is ludicrous!  I am a senior physician, and I do my own "scribing" - not the most junior member of the team. I would love to have a scribe, but I would worry they may not take down everything I said, or that the patient said, or introduced inaccuracies. But from the discussion so far, it seems everyone has a universally positive attitude toward the scribe system. Yes, it would free me up as a doctor to actually be able to spend time with patients and talk to them and examine them, to figure out what's wrong with them.  If this would allow me time to use electronic diagnostic tool aids, that would be fabulous. As it is, I'm told that's "the old way of practicing medicine" (actually spending time talking to a patient), so I'd be all for a scribe. But the hospital won't support that, when they can get physicians to do their own scribing, without paying them one cent more.  Thank you, affordable health care act! 
> 
> Barbara E. Shapiro, M.D.,Ph.D.
> 
> Associate Professor of Neurology
> 
> UHCMC/CWRU
> 
> Neurological Institute
> 
> 11100 Euclid Avenue
> 
> Cleveland, OH  44106-5098
> 
> 
> 
> (216) 844-7768  phone
> 
> (216) 983-0792  fax
> 
> 
> 
> Confidential Quality Assurance Peer Review Report Privileged Pursuant to O.R.C. Section 2305.24,2305.25,2305.251 and 2305.252
> 
> ________________________________________
> From: Slater, William [WSlater at PHCN.VIC.GOV.AU]
> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 4:22 PM
> To: IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG
> Subject: Re: [IMPROVEDX] Scribes and diagnostic error
> 
> Thanks for the replies. An interesting 'phenomenon'. Methinks scribes are not universally deployed in U.S hospital settings, so my question is then, where they are not part of the local system, who or what does this role? Is it perhaps the most 'junior' doctor on the round, as it is here? Very well paid clerks / secretaries / scribes they are too.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kohn, Michael [mailto:Michael.Kohn at ucsf.edu]
> Sent: Wednesday, 29 January 2014 7:18 AM
> To: Slater, William; Society to Improve Diagnosis in Medicine
> Subject: RE: Scribes and diagnostic error
> 
> Dear Bill,
> 
> I am an emergency physician at a community, nonteaching hospital. In answer to your question, our scribes are persons specifically trained and recruited for the job. We use a national company called AmeriScribe.   The scribes tend to be  recent college graduates who are taking time off  before medical school, PA school, or nursing school.
> 
> I did not say it in my email, but we use Epic as our EHR.    We started using scribes about a year after going to Epic, but scribes would have been just as valuable before we started using an EHR.   Again, the relationship between using scribes and reducing diagnostic error is indirect but it's there.
> 
> Michael
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Michael A. Kohn, MD, MPP
> Emergency Physician
> Mills Peninsula Hospital
> 
> 
> ________________________________________
> From: Slater, William [WSlater at phcn.vic.gov.au]
> Sent: Monday, January 27, 2014 2:48 PM
> To: Society to Improve Diagnosis in Medicine; Kohn, Michael
> Subject: RE: Scribes and diagnostic error
> 
> I am curious about the "scribe". Is this a specific role which is filled by persons specifically trained and recruited for it, or is it a role which is undertaken by the most "junior" doctor/student attending a patient with you. Working in what American's might call a hospitalist role here in Australia - I am increasingly concerned about our interns getting by with merely performing the role of a "scribe" on a processional ward round and not actually getting to directly engage with patients themselves. There is an enormous amount of paperwork required and the person primarily expected to do this is the intern. I would find this very frustrating if I were them (and many do).
> Bill Slater
> Director Physician education.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kohn, Michael [mailto:Michael.Kohn at UCSF.EDU]
> Sent: Sunday, 26 January 2014 6:37 AM
> To: IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG
> Subject: [IMPROVEDX] Scribes and diagnostic error
> 
> dear colleagues,
> 
> I am  an emergency physician who has worked with scribes for three years now, after 20 years doing my documentation  unassisted.  After initial skepticism, I am completely converted. The link between using scribes and reducing diagnostic error is indirect.  They provide a second set of ears to listen to the patient's  symptoms and decrease the  probability of missing something important to  making the diagnosis.   Anything that gives us more time to focus on the patient will also decrease the number of diagnostic errors that we make.  Also,  I agree about the utility of computerized decision support tools to reduce diagnostic error.  So scribes can help by allowing us more time to consult  the computerized support tools.   I do not ask the scribes to log into and use the computerized support tools for me.   They are not sophisticated enough for that.
> 
> Michael A. Kohn, MD, MPP
> 
> ________________________________________
> From: Dr Wil [dr.will at FUSE.NET]
> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2014 7:09 PM
> To: IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG
> Subject: Re: [IMPROVEDX] [EXTERNAL] [IMPROVEDX] The right dx
> 
> That is why scribes are necessary in the era of EMR so clinicians might be able to use decision support tools and spend more time with the patient and be able to bill for the medical service in order to stay in business.
> What does everyone else think?
> Will Sawyer MD
> 
> 
> 
> Peninsula Health - Metropolitan Health Service of the Year 2007 & 2009
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Moderator: Lorri Zipperer Lorri at ZPM1.com, Communication co-chair, Society for Improving Diagnosis in Medicine
> 
> To unsubscribe from the IMPROVEDX list, click the following link:<br>
> <a href="http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1" target="_blank">http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1</a>
> </p>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Visit us at www.UHhospitals.org.
> 
> The enclosed information is STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the
> use of the addressee only. University Hospitals and its affiliates disclaim
> any responsibility for unauthorized disclosure of this information to anyone
> other than the addressee.
> 
> Federal and Ohio law protect patient medical information, including
> psychiatric_disorders, (H.I.V) test results, A.I.Ds-related conditions,
> alcohol, and/or drug_dependence or abuse disclosed in this email. Federal
> regulation (42 CFR Part 2) and Ohio Revised Code section 5122.31 and
> 3701.243 prohibit disclosure of this information without the specific
> written consent of the person to whom it pertains, or as otherwise permitted
> by law.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Moderator: Lorri Zipperer Lorri at ZPM1.com, Communication co-chair, Society for Improving Diagnosis in Medicine
> 
> To unsubscribe from the IMPROVEDX list, click the following link:<br>
> <a href="http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1" target="_blank">http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1</a>
> </p>
> 










More information about the Test mailing list