other murky, messy Dx-related terms

Janel Hopper janelhopper at COMCAST.NET
Thu Apr 10 16:06:04 UTC 2014

Hello. I have not followed all of this thread but feel the need to speak up, having long suffered misdiagnosis. The key word why these issues are not properly and coherently communicated is "the code." Doctors everywhere cover for the mistake. It becomes very hard for the patient to get proper care anywhere because doctors don't want to be attached to any kind of mistake. 
Sole proprietorships seem like the only hope, and they are going by the wayside.
I think the problems are ego, lawyers, and apparently an ethos that protects the medical fraternity over the patient.
At least this seems to be clear in the case of their having missed my pernicious anemia and the many complications I now suffer.
I hope some of you might speak to what I am raising.

Sent from my iPhone

> On Apr 9, 2014, at 12:14 PM, Lorri Zipperer <Lorri at ZPM1.COM> wrote:
> Thank you Alan for bringing the conversation back to a broader issue ;-).
> Messiness of terminology is problematic in many facets of patient safety.
> What terms do you think cause the most trouble in trying to not only communicate with our professional peers, but with our patients and families around Dx error and improvement efforts?
> When you respond to this question – pls note either “peer” or “patient” in the subject line above to streamline the comments abit.
> Thanks –
> Lorri
> Lorri Zipperer, Cybrarian and editor
> Zipperer Project Management
> Patient Safety: Perspectives in Evidence, Information and Knowledge Transfer
> http://www.gowerpublishing.com/isbn/9781409438571 (May 2014)
> ISBN 978-1-4094-3857-1
> Knowledge Management in Health Care
> http://www.gowerpublishing.com/isbn/9781409438830; 2014.
> ISBN: 978-1-4094-3883-0
> lorri at zpm1.com
> www.zpm1.com
> http://www.linkedin.com/pub/lorri-zipperer/0/661/904
> Blog
> http://patientsafetylib.blogspot.com/
> Data: nurse numbers
> Information: nurse textbooks
> Evidence: nurse effectiveness
> Knowledge: nurse experience
> From: Alan Morris [mailto:Alan.Morris at IMAIL.ORG] 
> Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2014 12:24 PM
> Those of you who have paid attention to my past suggestions about standardization might see in this exchange the problems that surface when standards are absent.  Some would assign to chronic renal insufficiency those whom others think normal.
> Have  a nice day.
> Alan H. Morris, M.D.
> Professor of Medicine
> Adjunct Prof. of Medical Informatics
> University of Utah
> Director of Research
> Director Urban Central Region Blood Gas and Pulmonary Laboratories
> Pulmonary/Critical Care Division
> Sorenson Heart & Lung Center - 6th Floor
> Intermountain Medical Center
> 5121 South Cottonwood Street
> Murray, Utah  84157-7000, USA
> To unsubscribe from IMPROVEDX: click the following link:
> http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1
> Visit the searchable archives or adjust your subscription at: http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?INDEX
> Moderator: Lorri Zipperer Lorri at ZPM1.com, Communication co-chair, Society for Improving Diagnosis in Medicine
> To learn more about SIDM visit:
> http://www.improvediagnosis.org/

HTML Version:
URL: <../attachments/20140410/5bbe6c20/attachment.html>

More information about the Test mailing list