Ebola in Dallas

Alan Morris Alan.Morris at IMAIL.ORG
Mon Oct 6 15:30:24 UTC 2014

As I have mentioned before, this is an example of the value of detailed
computer decision-support tools.  Once data are acquired (by RN, MD,
Patient with and iPone or iPad, telephoneĊ ) they can drive rules.  This is
clearly feasible across disciplines and cultures, but scalability is not
yet tested.

Alan H. Morris, M.D.
Professor of Medicine
Adjunct Prof. of Medical Informatics
University of Utah

Director of Research
Pulmonary/Critical Care Division
Sorenson Heart & Lung Center - 6th Floor
Intermountain Medical Center
5121 South Cottonwood Street
Murray, Utah  84157-7000, USA

Office Phone: 801-507-4603
Mobile Phone: 801-718-1283
Fax: 801-507-4699
e-mail: alan.morris at imail.org
e-mail: alanhmorris at gmail.com

On 10/5/14, 4:31 PM, "David L Meyers" <dm0015 at ICLOUD.COM> wrote:

>It appears that the cause of improving diagnosis in medicine was given an
>unfortunate boost in Dallas this week with the (mis)handling of the
>nation's first case of ebola both at the clinical and public health
>levels, that is already having risk management and public policy effects.
> With respect to the actual care of the patient, who was not diagnosed
>until his second ED visit several days after his first one to the same
>ED, the full story remains to be elucidated, but we've witnessed the
>painful release of information followed by corrections and restatements
>that too often characterize events of this sort.
>Initially, a nurse seemed to be the culprit blamed for obtaining critical
>information about travel history from the Liberian patient recently
>arrived in Dallas from Lagos via Brussels and Washington and not passing
>it on the health care team or following the CDC guidelines for handling
>such patients, said to be in place at the hospital.  Next, blame focused
>on the failure of the EHR to properly communicate information between the
>nurse and subsequent providers including the treating physician. The
>latest information seems to be that the physician had the information and
>made a wrong decision regarding diagnosis, management and disposition;
>whether s/he acquired relevant history independently or from the EHR is
>not clear.  
>More information and analysis is trickling in and it will be sometime
>before most of the facts are known, but it is clear there were human
>errors and system errors which contributed to the situation. This may
>wind up being the most studied case of diagnostic error to date with the
>greatest potential to alter how the public sees this problem.  I imagine
>the IOM committee now addressing this subject will have some very
>instructive material to work with.  Root cause analysis anyone?
>Here's a chronicle of the events as pieced together by the Dallas Morning
>News.  Interesting reading.
>To unsubscribe from the IMPROVEDX:
>or click the following link: IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG
>For additional information and subscription commands, visit:
>http://LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG/ (with your password)
>Visit the searchable archives or adjust your subscription at:
>Moderator: Lorri Zipperer Lorri at ZPM1.com, Communication co-chair, Society
>for Improving Diagnosis in Medicine
>To unsubscribe from the IMPROVEDX list, click the following link:<br>

More information about the Test mailing list