Positive tests

Robert Bell rmsbell200 at YAHOO.COM
Mon Mar 9 16:18:03 UTC 2015


Agree, agree - so why does someone not recommend standard procedures?  Let's first get the basics sorted out. Let's pick the low hanging fruit first.

Should every private office have at least one person dedicated to preventing error?

Rob B

Sent from my iPad

On Mar 9, 2015, at 7:54 AM, "Hoffer, Edward P.,M.D." <EHOFFER at MGH.HARVARD.EDU> wrote:

> I would respectfully disagree. I tell my patients that while MOST of the time, no news = good news, in a small percentage of situations, no news = the test got lost, the report was misfiled, the specimen was never received, etc. I doubt many doctors intentionally do not tell patients about abnormal findings, I do believe that a test that never gets reported is easy to lose sight of.  So, closed loop = better. It is not much effort to write “good news” on a report and mail a copy to the patient if you do not have a portal.
> 
> Ed
> 
> Edward P Hoffer MD
> 
>  
> 
> From: Mark H Ebell [mailto:ebell at UGA.EDU] 
> Sent: Sunday, March 08, 2015 10:53 PM
> To: IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG
> Subject: Re: [IMPROVEDX] Positive tests
> 
>  
> 
> While in an ideal world, that makes sense, in a busy primary care practice in the non-academic setting, communicating every negative result would impose a large cost on the practice. Someone has to call or mail or email every patient for every test ever ordered. I don’t think that’s realistic. Not that it wouldn’t be valuable, but in the real world it probably makes more sense to be selective in communicating negative findings, focusing on critical results (you don’t have cancer, your cath was normal, etc).
> 
>  
> 
> Best,
> 
>  
> 
> Mark
> 
>  
> 
>> 
> Mark H. Ebell MD, MS
> 
> Professor of Epidemiology
> 
> University of Georgia
> 
> Editor, Essential Evidence
> 
> Deputy Editor, American Family Physician
> 
> ebell at uga.edu
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> From: <Pauker>, Stephen
> Reply-To: Society to Improve Diagnosis in Medicine, "Pauker, Stephen"
> Date: Sunday, March 8, 2015 at 8:10 PM
> To: "IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG"
> Subject: Re: [IMPROVEDX] Positive tests
> 
>  
> 
> In my experience and writings , negative or normal test results can be quite important in making a diagnosis, so not communicating them to the patient can be withholding key information. All results positive or negative should be communicated. Further withholding them can sometimes lead to repeating the test
> 
> Steve
> 
> 
> 
> Sent with Good (www.good.com)
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Bell [rmsbell at ESEDONA.NET]
> Sent: Sunday, March 08, 2015 01:33 PM Eastern Standard Time
> To: IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG
> Subject: [IMPROVEDX] Positive tests
> 
> 
> 
> Many doctor's offices only call or mention to patients positive test results that have been undertaken (particularly lab tests). Is that a good thing and does it in any way impact diagnosis?
> 
> Also, what are the effects of the new electronic portals on diagnosis. It is a big change in medicine.
> 
> Rob Bell
> 
> Sent from my iPad
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Moderator: David Meyers, Board Member, Society to Improve Diagnosis in Medicine
> 
> To unsubscribe from the IMPROVEDX list, click the following link:<br>
> <a href="http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1" target="_blank">http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1</a>
> </p>
> 
> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Tufts Medical Center HIPAA Hotline at (617) 636-4422. If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe from IMPROVEDX: click the following link:
> http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1
> 
> or send email to: IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG
> 
> Visit the searchable archives or adjust your subscription at: http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?INDEX
> 
> 
> Moderator:David Meyers, Board Member, Society for Improving Diagnosis in Medicine
> 
> To learn more about SIDM visit:
> http://www.improvediagnosis.org/
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe from IMPROVEDX: click the following link:
> http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1
> 
> or send email to: IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG
> 
> Visit the searchable archives or adjust your subscription at: http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?INDEX
> 
> 
> Moderator:David Meyers, Board Member, Society for Improving Diagnosis in Medicine
> 
> To learn more about SIDM visit:
> http://www.improvediagnosis.org/
> 
> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
> dispose of the e-mail.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe from IMPROVEDX: click the following link:
> http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1
> or send email to: IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG
> 
> Visit the searchable archives or adjust your subscription at: http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?INDEX
> 
> Moderator:David Meyers, Board Member, Society for Improving Diagnosis in Medicine
> 
> To learn more about SIDM visit:
> http://www.improvediagnosis.org/






Moderator: David Meyers, Board Member, Society to Improve Diagnosis in Medicine


HTML Version:
URL: <../attachments/20150309/07e9209d/attachment.html>


More information about the Test mailing list