The patient portal and Positive tests

Swerlick, Robert A rswerli at EMORY.EDU
Mon Mar 9 23:52:04 UTC 2015


They are probably as well tested as the protocols and tools they replace. That said, you are absolutely correct in that what we are witnessing a huge change.

Robert A. Swerlick, MD
Alicia Leizman Stonecipher Chair of Dermatology
Professor and Chairman, Department of Dermatology
Emory University School of Medicine
404-727-3669
________________________________
From: Robert Bell [0000000296e45ec4-dmarc-request at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG]
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2015 12:09 PM
To: IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG
Subject: Re: [IMPROVEDX] The patient portal and Positive tests

Interesting.

An advancement, but patients are like physicians, not all are good "proof readers" - but a true improvement I think. Will more easily interpreted/understood words for patients eventually be used? To me it is a big, big change with immense consequences.

Does anyone know if portals were well tested prior to introduction?

Rob B

Sent from my iPad

On Mar 9, 2015, at 6:18 AM, "Bruno, Michael" <mbruno at HMC.PSU.EDU<mailto:mbruno at HMC.PSU.EDU>> wrote:

Hi Bob,

One thing the patient web portals seem to be changing is the quality and clarity of Radiologists’ written reports.  Because of the portals, the Radiologist’s report is now under more “quality pressure” than ever, since their readership has been suddenly expanded to include a brand new audience—the patients themselves.  Turns out patients are typically much more critical of flaws in the reports than the referring physicians are/were, and so they are providing very powerful feedback to the report writers.  So that’s at least ONE positive development from the portals.  See the attached PDF of an essay I co-authored last year on that topic, which was published in the Journal of the ACR.

Theoretically, if there is enough patient engagement around the portals, errors and misunderstandings might be caught and cleared up before harm is done by having the patient serve as the final ‘proofreader’ of their own medical record.

All the best,

Mike B.
Hershey, PA


From: robert bell [mailto:0000000296e45ec4-dmarc-request at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG<mailto:0000000296e45ec4-dmarc-request at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG>]
Sent: Sunday, March 08, 2015 3:28 PM
To: <mailto:IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG> IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG<mailto:IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG>
Subject: Re: [IMPROVEDX] Positive tests

Great Post Peggy,

Do you think the Portal internet revolution will change anything for the better or worse? Also, Dr. Pronovost first did a study at Johns Hopkins with his catheter infection study before it was expanded to save so many lives. Do we know if studies were done with the new Portal initiative prior to going public/nationwide to work out any kinks?

Brings up the issue of what level of study needs to be done to recommend anything to prevent errors in diagnosis (or for that matter all errors in medicine). Can you recommend to all something which just seems common sense without studies?

Rob B

Brings up the issue that I have mentioned before regarding standardizing procedures and building in double checks etc. Theoretically, that could be done tomorrow.
On Mar 8, 2015, at 10:52 AM, Peggy Zuckerman <<mailto:peggyzuckerman at GMAIL.COM>peggyzuckerman at GMAIL.COM<mailto:peggyzuckerman at GMAIL.COM>> wrote:

There are studies which show that up to 15% of labs which indicate abnormal findings are not conveyed to the patient.  One hopes that this info is not always critical.
On a larger scale, when the patient never receives a copy of the labs, there is no reason for that patient to feel at all responsible for the numbers!  In effect, this teaches the patient that he is not responsible for his own healthcare, with often disastrous consequences.
Of course, a patient who can compare lab results over a period of time may note trends that are missed by the doctor's review, or note something else that was not initially of concern during the previous appointment.  Could be cholesterol, WBC, or platelets, when the appointment was about blood pressure issues.
Not only should blood labs be given to patients, so should  radiology reports.  Cannot tell you how many times patients in my kidney cancer group indicate that there was a tumor noted on a report, but never mentioned by the doctor. Perhaps a too-cursory look by the doctor, but such a finding would be noted by the patient, questioned and lead to an earlier diagnosis.
Peggy Z


On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 8:46 AM, Robert Bell <<mailto:rmsbell at esedona.net>rmsbell at esedona.net<mailto:rmsbell at esedona.net>> wrote:
Many doctor's offices only call or mention to patients positive test results that have been undertaken (particularly lab tests). Is that a good thing and does it in any way impact diagnosis?

Also, what are the effects of the new electronic portals on diagnosis. It is a big change in medicine.

Rob Bell

Sent from my iPad
To unsubscribe from the IMPROVEDX:
mail to:IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG<mailto:to%3AIMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG>
or click the following link: <mailto:IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG> IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG<mailto:IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG>

Address messages to: <mailto:IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG> IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG<mailto:IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG>

For additional information and subscription commands, visit:
<http://www.lsoft.com/resources/faq.asp#4A>http://www.lsoft.com/resources/faq.asp#4A

<http://list.improvediagnosis.org/>http://LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG/ (with your password)

Visit the searchable archives or adjust your subscription at:
<http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?INDEX>http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?INDEX

Moderator: David Meyers, Board Member, Society to Improve Diagnosis in Medicine

To unsubscribe from the IMPROVEDX list, click the following link:<br>
<a href="<http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1>http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1" target="_blank"><http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1>http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1</a>
</p>



--
Peggy Zuckerman
<http://www.peggyrcc.com/>www.peggyRCC.com<http://www.peggyRCC.com>

________________________________

Address messages to: <mailto:IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG> IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG<mailto:IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG>

To unsubscribe from IMPROVEDX: click the following link:
<http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1>http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1

or send email to: <mailto:IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG> IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG<mailto:IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG>

Visit the searchable archives or adjust your subscription at: <http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?INDEX> http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?INDEX


Moderator:David Meyers, Board Member, Society for Improving Diagnosis in Medicine

To learn more about SIDM visit:
<http://www.improvediagnosis.org/>http://www.improvediagnosis.org/


As of 1.1.2015 my new email address is: <mailto:rmsbell200 at yahoo.com> rmsbell200 at yahoo.com<mailto:rmsbell200 at yahoo.com>

Please update your address books accordingly


________________________________

Address messages to: <mailto:IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG> IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG<mailto:IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG>

To unsubscribe from IMPROVEDX: click the following link:
<http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1>http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1
or send email to: <mailto:IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG> IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG<mailto:IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG>

Visit the searchable archives or adjust your subscription at: <http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?INDEX> http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?INDEX

Moderator:David Meyers, Board Member, Society for Improving Diagnosis in Medicine

To learn more about SIDM visit:
<http://www.improvediagnosis.org/>http://www.improvediagnosis.org/

________________________________

Address messages to: <mailto:IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG> IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG<mailto:IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG>

To unsubscribe from IMPROVEDX: click the following link:
<http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1>http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1

or send email to: <mailto:IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG> IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG<mailto:IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG>

Visit the searchable archives or adjust your subscription at: <http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?INDEX> http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?INDEX

Moderator:David Meyers, Board Member, Society for Improving Diagnosis in Medicine

To learn more about SIDM visit:
http://www.improvediagnosis.org/

<The Open Letter - JACR Sept 2014.pdf>

________________________________


To unsubscribe from IMPROVEDX: click the following link:
http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1

or send email to: IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG

Visit the searchable archives or adjust your subscription at: http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?INDEX

Moderator:David Meyers, Board Member, Society for Improving Diagnosis in Medicine

To learn more about SIDM visit:
http://www.improvediagnosis.org/

________________________________

This e-mail message (including any attachments) is for the sole use of
the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged
information. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution
or copying of this message (including any attachments) is strictly
prohibited.

If you have received this message in error, please contact
the sender by reply e-mail message and destroy all copies of the
original message (including attachments).






Moderator: David Meyers, Board Member, Society to Improve Diagnosis in Medicine


HTML Version:
URL: <../attachments/20150309/24454e91/attachment.html>


More information about the Test mailing list