Medical Malpractice article questions

Vic Nicholls nichollsvi2 at GMAIL.COM
Sun Jun 7 21:30:29 UTC 2015

Looking at this:

On 1) Could the "watch and wait" treatment be an issue here? Where the 
wait was too long or not enough? Could it also be an issue with the way 
blood/urine test levels/ranges are set up? Could they be setting up 
doctors to fail because the ranges are too wide or too absolute?

On 5) With EHR's, is this really a problem?

On 6) How could that be a doctors' fault?

On 9) Wouldn't a doctor rule out something and then move on to what they 
thought it might be?



Moderator: David Meyers, Board Member, Society to Improve Diagnosis in Medicine

To unsubscribe from the IMPROVEDX list, click the following link:<br>
<a href="" target="_blank"></a>

HTML Version:
URL: <../attachments/20150607/a7fa31fb/attachment.html>

More information about the Test mailing list