disappointed

Ross Koppel rkoppel at SAS.UPENN.EDU
Mon Sep 28 11:39:05 UTC 2015


    
So, Ted, will folk be tempted to offer more granular codes to get paid more....even if the codes may be unintentionally inaccurate and thus lead some down the possibility of a wrong path and treatment?  False precision is not helpful of course.  Ross


Ross Koppel, PhD, FACMIUniversity of PennsylvaniaSociology Dept.; Sch. of Medicine;      LDI Senior Fellow (Wharton).  Sent by old manual Underwood typewriter

-------- Original message --------
From: Ted.E.Palen at KP.ORG 
Date: 09/27/2015  5:35 PM  (GMT-05:00) 
To: IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG 
Subject: Re: [IMPROVEDX] disappointed 

In ICD 10Cough R05Right Knee pain M25.561So I think general non- specific terms as of October are still possible but reimbursement rate for a general term maybe less than for a more specific condition.And there in lies some of the problem, diagnostic data tied to billing terms rather than to actual clinical evaluation and decision making. 

Ted E. Palen, PhD, MD, MSPHPhysician Manager Clinical Reporting Utilization ManagementInstitute of Health ResearchColorado Permanente Medical Group10065 E Harvard Ave, Suite 300Denver CO  80231
Phone: 303-614-1215Fax: 303-614-1305email: ted.e.palen at kp.org
On Sep 27, 2015, at 1:43 PM, "Swerlick, Robert A" <rswerli at emory.edu> wrote:




P {
	MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0px; MARGIN-TOP: 0px
}




You may not be able to do that after October 1 because of ICD-10 deployment.

 

Robert A. Swerlick, MD
Alicia Leizman Stonecipher Chair of Dermatology
Professor and Chairman, Department of Dermatology
Emory University School of Medicine
404-727-3669 




From: Ted.E.Palen at KP.ORG [Ted.E.Palen at KP.ORG]

Sent: Saturday, September 26, 2015 11:20 PM

To: IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG

Subject: Re: [IMPROVEDX] disappointed






I often list a general diagnosis if I am unsure of a specific diagnosis. Such as, cough, instead of viral bronchitis, or knee pain instead of collateral ligament strain, if I am not sure of the more specific diagnosis.  


Ted E. Palen, PhD, MD, MSPH
Physician Manager Clinical Reporting 
Utilization Management
Institute of Health Research
Colorado Permanente Medical Group
10065 E Harvard Ave, Suite 300
Denver CO  80231



Phone: 303-614-1215
Fax: 303-614-1305
email: ted.e.palen at kp.org



On Sep 26, 2015, at 8:50 AM, "Charlie Garland - The Innovation Outlet" <cgarland at INNOVATIONOUTLET.BIZ> wrote:






Mark, you (and others here) bring up an outstanding point.  Imagine for a minute what would happen if the EMR screen suddenly had a data entry field for a "degree of certainty" value (percentage) next to the ICD code.  Would this not compel the physician
 to think just a bit more carefully -- at that very moment -- about just how confident he/she is about the Dx?  And, wouldn't that then (some portion of the time) trigger the contemplation of at least one alternative DDx?



Now, imagine that "confidence field" being gone (which it is).  Isn't the implicit assumption here that the diagnostician is 100% confident of his/her diagnosis?  Whether or not this is how anyone might intend or infer the EMR data, in some cases, that
 is the way it's regarded.  Considering what Brian Jackson mentioned, in some portion of cases, there is clearly a degree of uncertainty that is in the mix.  And that data value -- regardless of how accurately it can be captured -- is something that seems likely
 to improve the prospects of patient safety, over the long haul at least.



It would be an interesting research study to see what would happen if an institution's EMR system explicitly offered an additional field or two (confidence interval, most likely DDx, etc.).  How would physicians respond to this, over time?  What might
 be the implications of that additional data -- and the "forcing strategy" effect it would possibly have on diagnosticians (and others accessing the same data) -- upon Dx error rates?



Just one opinion.



=================================================
 
Charlie Garland, President



The Innovation Outlet
          <sigimg1.jpg>
   Get Plugged-In!TM




office:  212.535.5385

mobile: 646.872.0256 



Developer of
The Innovation Cube (a.k.a. CubieTM -
 a Critical Thinking & Creative Problem-Solving Tool)
Developer of

Cognitive Buoyancy ("The Trigger to Innovation")  
Senior Fellow of
HITLAB (Healthcare Innovation & Technology Laboratory @ Columbia University Medical Center)
Proud Affiliate of

Schaffer Consulting (featuring RapidResults® Innovation)
Certified in

Polarity ThinkingTM 
Improve Your Sales: www.InnoSalesCoach.com (Applying Innovation Tools, Methods, & Insights
 to Your Sales/Marketing Process)
Increase Your Innovation Capacity:

Certified Innovation CoachTM (Innovator MindsetTM Assessments)
Main Website: 
www.TheInnovationOutlet.com 
 
LinkedIn:
http://www.linkedin.com/in/innovationoutlet
Twitter: @innovationator



 









-------- Original Message --------

Subject: Re: [IMPROVEDX] disappointed

From: Mark Graber <graber.mark at GMAIL.COM>

Date: Thu, September 24, 2015 8:12 pm

To: IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG



I'm seconding Brian Jackson's suggestion to move towards attaching levels of certainty to each diagnosis.  I'm especially fond of the "NYD" label Sam Campbell had on his list of the 10 best things to have happened in the field of emergency medicine in Canada.
   NYD = not yet diagnoses.  This would alert the next person in the chain to keep thinking !   If we only had an ICD-10 code for that …..



On Sep 24, 2015, at 10:32 AM, Jackson, Brian <brian.jackson at aruplab.com> wrote:


#wmQuoteWrapper P.MsoNormal {
	FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman","serif"; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt
}
#wmQuoteWrapper LI.MsoNormal {
	FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman","serif"; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt
}
#wmQuoteWrapper DIV.MsoNormal {
	FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman","serif"; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt
}
#wmQuoteWrapper A:link {
	TEXT-DECORATION: underline; COLOR: blue
}
#wmQuoteWrapper SPAN.MsoHyperlink {
	TEXT-DECORATION: underline; COLOR: blue
}
#wmQuoteWrapper A:visited {
	TEXT-DECORATION: underline; COLOR: purple
}
#wmQuoteWrapper SPAN.MsoHyperlinkFollowed {
	TEXT-DECORATION: underline; COLOR: purple
}
#wmQuoteWrapper P.MsoAcetate {
	FONT-SIZE: 8pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Tahoma","sans-serif"; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt
}
#wmQuoteWrapper LI.MsoAcetate {
	FONT-SIZE: 8pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Tahoma","sans-serif"; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt
}
#wmQuoteWrapper DIV.MsoAcetate {
	FONT-SIZE: 8pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Tahoma","sans-serif"; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt
}
#wmQuoteWrapper SPAN.EmailStyle18 {
	FONT-FAMILY: "Calibri","sans-serif"; COLOR: #1f497d
}
#wmQuoteWrapper SPAN.BalloonTextChar {
	FONT-FAMILY: "Tahoma","sans-serif"
}
#wmQuoteWrapper .MsoChpDefault {
	FONT-SIZE: 10pt
}



We might want to be careful about this one.  From a research perspective, analyzing time to diagnosis would indeed be interesting
 and productive.  But if in the process we give regulators, payors and attorneys new ways to punish delays at an individual physician level, it could amplify premature closure and overdiagnosis.
 
A suggestion others have brought up, and I suspect this needs to be pushed more aggressively, is the concept of explicitly labeling
 diagnoses with their level of certainty, e.g. as tentative or working diagnoses where appropriate.  Sometimes empiric therapy is the best way to proceed.  When empiric therapy fails, it doesn’t necessarily mean the diagnostic process failed, i.e. that a diagnostic
 error occurred.
 
Many of the complications introduced by both medicolegal and quality improvement efforts come from treating diagnosis as a black
 and white situation.  As much as I like the current news coverage of the IOM report, it’s reinforcing that black/white perspective.
 
--Brian Jackson
 


From: robert bell [mailto:0000000296e45ec4-dmarc-request at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG]


Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2015 3:25 PM

To: IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG

Subject: Re: [IMPROVEDX] disappointed


 
But our foot is in the door.  

 


Also, as we get more information on Time to Diagnosis, it would seem that there could be a kind of “standard time to diagnosis,” for less common diseases/conditions that could be adjusted from time to time as we
 get more proficient (e.g. for myasthenia gravis), perhaps even adjusted in some way for the medical sophistication of the medical center in question!


 


Do we need to talk about standards for what is a delayed diagnosis?  Or maybe that has already been discussed.


 


Just publishing a list of the common conditions we THINK are diseases of delayed diagnosis would be a start.

 


Rob Bell, M.D.


 


 



On Sep 23, 2015, at 11:19 AM, Michael Grossman <Michael.Grossman at MIHS.ORG> wrote:

 

I agree with your assessment. The IOM sometimes seems to fall short of expectations. Their relatively recent report on Graduate Medical Education was disappointing.


The fact that multiple news agencies are running with this story may lead to some misunderstandings , especially on the nature of "delayed diagnoses".

Michael Grossman, MD MACP



-----Original Message-----

From: Robert L Wears, MD, MS, PhD [mailto:wears at UFL.EDU]


Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2015 9:31 AM

To: IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG

Subject: [IMPROVEDX] disappointed



Great that misdiagnosis and related failures are getting attention, but ...



This is a disappointing effort; a naïve, keyhole view of a complex problem.



I count 82 mentions of 'error' in the first 15 pages (~5.5 per page), 753 in the entire document.



Lots of discussion about biases (78 mentions) but important issues that challenge the focus on 'error', such as hindsight bias, or outcome bias, are never mentioned even once.



This restriction to a very narrow framing of the problem is unlikely to lead to progress.



bob







Robert L Wears, MD, MS, PhD

University of Florida              Imperial College London

wears at ufl.edu                       
r.wears at imperial.ac.uk

1-904-244-4405 (ass't)            +44 (0)791 015 2219

Nothing matters very much, and very few things matter at all.

                                                 ---Balfour



To unsubscribe from the IMPROVEDX:

mail to:IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG

or click the following link: 
IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG



Address messages to: 
IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG



For additional information and subscription commands, visit:

http://www.lsoft.com/resources/faq.asp#4A



http://LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG/ (with your password)



Visit the searchable archives or adjust your subscription at:

http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?INDEX



Moderator: David Meyers, Board Member, Society to Improve Diagnosis in Medicine



To unsubscribe from the IMPROVEDX list, click the following link:<br> <a href="http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1"
 target="_blank">http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1</a>

</p>



To unsubscribe from the IMPROVEDX:

mail to:IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG

or click the following link: 
IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG



Address messages to: 
IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG



For additional information and subscription commands, visit:

http://www.lsoft.com/resources/faq.asp#4A



http://LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG/ (with your password)



Visit the searchable archives or adjust your subscription at:

http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?INDEX



Moderator: David Meyers, Board Member, Society to Improve Diagnosis in Medicine



To unsubscribe from the IMPROVEDX list, click the following link:<br>

<a href="http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1" target="_blank">http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1</a>

</p>



 


Robert M. Bell, M.D., Ph.C.


P.O. Box 3668


West Sedona, AZ  86340-3668


USA


Tel: Fax: 928 203-4517


 

 

 


 





Address messages to: 
IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG



To unsubscribe from IMPROVEDX: click the following link:

http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1

or send email to: 
IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG



Visit the searchable archives or adjust your subscription at: 
http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?INDEX


Moderator:David Meyers, Board Member, Society for Improving Diagnosis in Medicine



To learn more about SIDM visit:

http://www.improvediagnosis.org/



-------------------------------------------------------------------

The information transmitted by this e-mail and any included

attachments are from ARUP Laboratories and are intended only for the

recipient. The information contained in this message is confidential

and may constitute inside or non-public information under

international, federal, or state securities laws, or protected health

information and is intended only for the use of the recipient.

Unauthorized forwarding, printing, copying, distributing, or use of

such information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you

are not the intended recipient, please promptly delete this e-mail

and notify the sender of the delivery error or you may call ARUP

Laboratories Compliance Hot Line in Salt Lake City, Utah USA at (+1

(800) 522-2787 ext. 2100









Address messages to: 
IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG



To unsubscribe from IMPROVEDX: click the following link:

http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1



or send email to: 
IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG



Visit the searchable archives or adjust your subscription at: 
http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?INDEX





Moderator:David Meyers, Board Member, Society for Improving Diagnosis in Medicine



To learn more about SIDM visit:

http://www.improvediagnosis.org/













Address messages to: 
IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG



To unsubscribe from IMPROVEDX: click the following link:

http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1

or send email to: 
IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG



Visit the searchable archives or adjust your subscription at: 
http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?INDEX



Moderator:David Meyers, Board Member, Society for Improving Diagnosis in Medicine



To learn more about SIDM visit:

http://www.improvediagnosis.org/








Address messages to: 
IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG



To unsubscribe from IMPROVEDX: click the following link:

http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1

or send email to: 
IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG



Visit the searchable archives or adjust your subscription at: 
http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?INDEX



Moderator:David Meyers, Board Member, Society for Improving Diagnosis in Medicine



To learn more about SIDM visit:

http://www.improvediagnosis.org/








Address messages to: IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG



To unsubscribe from IMPROVEDX: click the following link:

http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1

or send email to: IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG



Visit the searchable archives or adjust your subscription at: http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?INDEX



Moderator:David Meyers, Board Member, Society for Improving Diagnosis in Medicine



To learn more about SIDM visit:

http://www.improvediagnosis.org/









This e-mail message (including any attachments) is for the sole use of

the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged

information. If the reader of this message is not the intended

recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution

or copying of this message (including any attachments) is strictly

prohibited.



If you have received this message in error, please contact

the sender by reply e-mail message and destroy all copies of the

original message (including attachments).






To unsubscribe from the IMPROVEDX:
mail to:IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG
or click the following link: IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG

Address messages to: IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG

For additional information and subscription commands, visit:
http://www.lsoft.com/resources/faq.asp#4A

http://LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG/ (with your password)

Visit the searchable archives or adjust your subscription at:
http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?INDEX

Moderator: David Meyers, Board Member, Society to Improve Diagnosis in Medicine

To unsubscribe from the IMPROVEDX list, click the following link:<br>
<a href="http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1" target="_blank">http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1</a>
</p>

HTML Version:
URL: <../attachments/20150928/3b112c26/attachment.html>


More information about the Test mailing list