disappointed

Joan M. Von Feldt, MD, MS Ed vonfeldt at MAIL.MED.UPENN.EDU
Mon Sep 28 16:03:40 UTC 2015


Yes Ross.  they absolutely will.  The front line docs are the ones that are  the least well paid for the cognitive work that they do. 


Joan M. Von Feldt, MD, MSEd 
Professor of Medicine 
Division of Rheumatology 
University of Pennsylvania 
Clinical office: 215-662-2454 
Admin office: 215-823-7536 
Cell: 215-900-5659 
Or 267-283-5828 


----- Original Message -----

From: "Ross Koppel" <rkoppel at SAS.UPENN.EDU> 
To: IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG 
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2015 7:39:05 AM 
Subject: Re: [IMPROVEDX] disappointed 


So, Ted, will folk be tempted to offer more granular codes to get paid more....even if the codes may be unintentionally inaccurate and thus lead some down the possibility of a wrong path and treatment?  False precision is not helpful of course.   
Ross 






Ross Koppel, PhD, FACMI 
University of Pennsylvania 
Sociology Dept.; Sch. of Medicine;      LDI Senior Fellow (Wharton).  Sent by old manual Underwood typewriter 

-------- Original message -------- 
From: Ted.E.Palen at KP.ORG 
Date: 09/27/2015 5:35 PM (GMT-05:00) 
To: IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG 
Subject: Re: [IMPROVEDX] disappointed 


In ICD 10 
Cough R05 
Right Knee pain  M25.561 
So I think general non- specific terms as of October are still possible but reimbursement rate for a general term maybe less than for a more specific condition. 
And there in lies some of the problem, diagnostic data tied to billing terms rather than to actual clinical evaluation and decision making.  

Ted E. Palen, PhD, MD, MSPH 
Physician Manager Clinical Reporting   
Utilization Management 
Institute of Health Research 
Colorado Permanente Medical Group 
10065 E Harvard Ave, Suite 300 
Denver CO  80231 


Phone: 303-614-1215 
Fax: 303-614-1305 
email: ted.e.palen at kp.org 

On Sep 27, 2015, at 1:43 PM, "Swerlick, Robert A" < rswerli at emory.edu > wrote: 






You may not be able to do that after October 1 because of ICD-10 deployment. 

  

Robert A. Swerlick, MD 
Alicia Leizman Stonecipher Chair of Dermatology 
Professor and Chairman, Department of Dermatology 
Emory University School of Medicine 
404-727-3669 


From: Ted.E.Palen at KP.ORG [ Ted.E.Palen at KP.ORG ] 
Sent: Saturday, September 26, 2015 11:20 PM 
To: IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG 
Subject: Re: [IMPROVEDX] disappointed 




I often list a general diagnosis if I am unsure of a specific diagnosis. Such as, cough, instead of viral bronchitis, or knee pain instead of collateral ligament strain, if I am not sure of the more specific diagnosis.   

Ted E. Palen, PhD, MD, MSPH 
Physician Manager Clinical Reporting   
Utilization Management 
Institute of Health Research 
Colorado Permanente Medical Group 
10065 E Harvard Ave, Suite 300 
Denver CO  80231 


Phone: 303-614-1215 
Fax: 303-614-1305 
email: ted.e.palen at kp.org 

On Sep 26, 2015, at 8:50 AM, "Charlie Garland - The Innovation Outlet" < cgarland at INNOVATIONOUTLET.BIZ > wrote: 


<blockquote>


Mark, you (and others here) bring up an outstanding point.  Imagine for a minute what would happen if the EMR screen suddenly had a data entry field for a "degree of certainty" value (percentage) next to the ICD code.  Would this not compel the physician to think just a bit more carefully -- at that very moment -- about just how confident he/she is about the Dx?  And, wouldn't that then (some portion of the time) trigger the contemplation of at least one alternative DDx? 


Now, imagine that "confidence field" being gone (which it is).  Isn't the implicit assumption here that the diagnostician is 100% confident of his/her diagnosis?  Whether or not this is how anyone might intend or infer the EMR data, in some cases, that is the way it's regarded.  Considering what Brian Jackson mentioned, in some portion of cases, there is clearly a degree of uncertainty that is in the mix.  And that data value -- regardless of how accurately it can be captured -- is something that seems likely to improve the prospects of patient safety, over the long haul at least. 


It would be an interesting research study to see what would happen if an institution's EMR system explicitly offered an additional field or two (confidence interval, most likely DDx, etc.).  How would physicians respond to this, over time?  What might be the implications of that additional data -- and the "forcing strategy" effect it would possibly have on diagnosticians (and others accessing the same data) -- upon Dx error rates? 


Just one opinion. 


================================================= 
  
Charlie Garland , President 


The Innovation Outlet 
          <sigimg1.jpg> 
   Get Plugged-In! TM 



office:  212.535.5385 
mobile: 646.872.0256  


Developer of The Innovation Cube  (a.k.a. Cubie TM   - a Critical Thinking & Creative Problem-Solving Tool) 
Developer of Cognitive Buoyancy ("The Trigger to Innovation")   
Senior Fellow of HITLAB (Healthcare Innovation & Technology Laboratory @ Columbia University Medical Center) 
Proud Affiliate of Schaffer Consulting  (featuring RapidResults® Innovation) 
Certified in Polarity Thinking TM   
Improve Your Sales:  www.InnoSalesCoach.com  (Applying Innovation Tools, Methods, & Insights to Your Sales/Marketing Process) 
Increase Your Innovation Capacity: Certified Innovation Coach TM  (Innovator Mindset TM  Assessments) 
Main Website: www.TheInnovationOutlet.com   
  
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/innovationoutlet 
Twitter:   @innovationator 


  





<blockquote>

-------- Original Message -------- 
Subject: Re: [IMPROVEDX] disappointed 
From: Mark Graber < graber.mark at GMAIL.COM > 
Date: Thu, September 24, 2015 8:12 pm 
To: IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG 

I'm seconding Brian Jackson's suggestion to move towards attaching levels of certainty to each diagnosis.  I'm especially fond of the "NYD" label Sam Campbell had on his list of the 10 best things to have happened in the field of emergency medicine in Canada.   NYD = not yet diagnoses.  This would alert the next person in the chain to keep thinking !   If we only had an ICD-10 code for that ….. 



On Sep 24, 2015, at 10:32 AM, Jackson, Brian < brian.jackson at aruplab.com > wrote: 




We might want to be careful about this one.  From a research perspective, analyzing time to diagnosis would indeed be interesting and productive.  But if in the process we give regulators, payors and attorneys new ways to punish delays at an individual physician level, it could amplify premature closure and overdiagnosis. 
  
A suggestion others have brought up, and I suspect this needs to be pushed more aggressively, is the concept of explicitly labeling diagnoses with their level of certainty, e.g. as tentative or working diagnoses where appropriate.  Sometimes empiric therapy is the best way to proceed.  When empiric therapy fails, it doesn’t necessarily mean the diagnostic process failed, i.e. that a diagnostic error occurred. 
  
Many of the complications introduced by both medicolegal and quality improvement efforts come from treating diagnosis as a black and white situation.  As much as I like the current news coverage of the IOM report, it’s reinforcing that black/white perspective. 
  
--Brian Jackson 
  


From: robert bell [ mailto:0000000296e45ec4-dmarc-request at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG ] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2015 3:25 PM 
To: IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG 
Subject: Re: [IMPROVEDX] disappointed 
  
But our foot is in the door.   

  

Also, as we get more information on Time to Diagnosis, it would seem that there could be a kind of “standard time to diagnosis,” for less common diseases/conditions that could be adjusted from time to time as we get more proficient (e.g. for myasthenia gravis), perhaps even adjusted in some way for the medical sophistication of the medical center in question! 

  

Do we need to talk about standards for what is a delayed diagnosis?  Or maybe that has already been discussed. 

  

Just publishing a list of the common conditions we THINK are diseases of delayed diagnosis would be a start. 

  

Rob Bell, M.D. 

  

  

<blockquote>


On Sep 23, 2015, at 11:19 AM, Michael Grossman < Michael.Grossman at MIHS.ORG > wrote: 
  

I agree with your assessment. The IOM sometimes seems to fall short of expectations. Their relatively recent report on Graduate Medical Education was disappointing. 
The fact that multiple news agencies are running with this story may lead to some misunderstandings , especially on the nature of "delayed diagnoses". 
Michael Grossman, MD MACP 

-----Original Message----- 
From: Robert L Wears, MD, MS, PhD [ mailto:wears at UFL.EDU ] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2015 9:31 AM 
To: IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG 
Subject: [IMPROVEDX] disappointed 

Great that misdiagnosis and related failures are getting attention, but ... 

This is a disappointing effort; a naïve, keyhole view of a complex problem. 

I count 82 mentions of 'error' in the first 15 pages (~5.5 per page), 753 in the entire document. 

Lots of discussion about biases (78 mentions) but important issues that challenge the focus on 'error', such as hindsight bias, or outcome bias, are never mentioned even once. 

This restriction to a very narrow framing of the problem is unlikely to lead to progress. 

bob 



Robert L Wears, MD, MS, PhD 
University of Florida               Imperial College London 
wears at ufl.edu                         r.wears at imperial.ac.uk 
1-904-244-4405 (ass't)             +44 (0)791 015 2219 
Nothing matters very much, and very few things matter at all. 
                                                 ---Balfour 

To unsubscribe from the IMPROVEDX: 
mail to:IMPROVEDX- SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG 
or click the following link: IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG 

Address messages to: IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG 

For additional information and subscription commands, visit: 
http://www.lsoft.com/resources/faq.asp#4A 

http://LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG/ (with your password) 

Visit the searchable archives or adjust your subscription at: 
http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?INDEX 

Moderator: David Meyers, Board Member, Society to Improve Diagnosis in Medicine 

To unsubscribe from the IMPROVEDX list, click the following link:<br> <a href=" http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1 " target="_blank"> http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1</a > 
</p> 

To unsubscribe from the IMPROVEDX: 
mail to:IMPROVEDX- SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG 
or click the following link: IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG 

Address messages to: IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG 

For additional information and subscription commands, visit: 
http://www.lsoft.com/resources/faq.asp#4A 

http://LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG/ (with your password) 

Visit the searchable archives or adjust your subscription at: 
http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?INDEX 

Moderator: David Meyers, Board Member, Society to Improve Diagnosis in Medicine 

To unsubscribe from the IMPROVEDX list, click the following link:<br> 
<a href=" http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1 " target="_blank"> http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1</a > 
</p> 


  


Robert M. Bell, M.D., Ph.C. 

P.O. Box 3668 

West Sedona, AZ  86340-3668 

USA 

Tel: Fax: 928 203-4517 

  
  
  
  



Address messages to: IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG 

To unsubscribe from IMPROVEDX: click the following link: 
http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1 
or send email to: IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG 

Visit the searchable archives or adjust your subscription at: http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?INDEX 

Moderator:David Meyers, Board Member, Society for Improving Diagnosis in Medicine 

To learn more about SIDM visit: 
http://www.improvediagnosis.org/ 
------------------------------------------------------------------- 
The information transmitted by this e-mail and any included 
attachments are from ARUP Laboratories and are intended only for the 
recipient. The information contained in this message is confidential 
and may constitute inside or non-public information under 
international, federal, or state securities laws, or protected health 
information and is intended only for the use of the recipient. 
Unauthorized forwarding, printing, copying, distributing, or use of 
such information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you 
are not the intended recipient, please promptly delete this e-mail 
and notify the sender of the delivery error or you may call ARUP 
Laboratories Compliance Hot Line in Salt Lake City, Utah USA at (+1 
(800) 522-2787 ext. 2100 




Address messages to: IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG 

To unsubscribe from IMPROVEDX: click the following link: 
http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1 

or send email to: IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG 

Visit the searchable archives or adjust your subscription at: http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?INDEX 


Moderator:David Meyers, Board Member, Society for Improving Diagnosis in Medicine 

To learn more about SIDM visit: 
http://www.improvediagnosis.org/ 





Address messages to: IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG 

To unsubscribe from IMPROVEDX: click the following link: 
http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1 
or send email to: IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG 

Visit the searchable archives or adjust your subscription at: http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?INDEX 

Moderator:David Meyers, Board Member, Society for Improving Diagnosis in Medicine 

To learn more about SIDM visit: 
http://www.improvediagnosis.org / 

</blockquote>



Address messages to: IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG 

To unsubscribe from IMPROVEDX: click the following link: 
http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1 
or send email to: IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG 

Visit the searchable archives or adjust your subscription at: http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?INDEX 

Moderator:David Meyers, Board Member, Society for Improving Diagnosis in Medicine 

To learn more about SIDM visit: 
http://www.improvediagnosis.org/ 

</blockquote>



Address messages to: IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG 

To unsubscribe from IMPROVEDX: click the following link: 
http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1 
or send email to: IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG 

Visit the searchable archives or adjust your subscription at: http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?INDEX 

Moderator:David Meyers, Board Member, Society for Improving Diagnosis in Medicine 

To learn more about SIDM visit: 
http://www.improvediagnosis.org/ 



This e-mail message (including any attachments) is for the sole use of 
the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged 
information. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution 
or copying of this message (including any attachments) is strictly 
prohibited. 

If you have received this message in error, please contact 
the sender by reply e-mail message and destroy all copies of the 
original message (including attachments). 

</blockquote>



Address messages to: IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG 

To unsubscribe from IMPROVEDX: click the following link: 
http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1 
or send email to: IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG 

Visit the searchable archives or adjust your subscription at: http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?INDEX 

Moderator:David Meyers, Board Member, Society for Improving Diagnosis in Medicine 

To learn more about SIDM visit: 
http://www.improvediagnosis.org/ 







Moderator: David Meyers, Board Member, Society to Improve Diagnosis in Medicine


HTML Version:
URL: <../attachments/20150928/3ccfe526/attachment.html>


More information about the Test mailing list