Blog posting on ICD-10 and Diagnosis

Robert Bell rmsbell200 at YAHOO.COM
Wed Nov 11 18:12:42 UTC 2015


Mark, what would be two things that you would like to see accomplished to help prevent diagnostic errors nation wide in say the next five years?

Rob Bell

Sent from my iPad

On Nov 11, 2015, at 8:24 AM, "Ely, John" <john-ely at UIOWA.EDU> wrote:

> Thanks for sending these Mark.  As you’ve noted, we know surprisingly little about the prevalence of the diseases that cause common symptoms in primary care.  Most differential diagnoses in textbooks and online resources are organized according to anatomy or body system, and we often teach medical students to use these organizational methods (or a mnemonic like VITAMIN D) when trying to generate a differential diagnosis from memory.  But these methods are not very helpful to clinicians.  I think more helpful would be to order the differential diagnosis according to disease prevalence, with the most prevalent diseases at the top.  (If we only knew what these prevalences were . . .)  There are other possibilities for ordering the diagnoses.  We could list serious “don’t miss” diagnoses first, followed by less serious diagnoses, and that would often lead to the reverse order of the prevalence method since rare diseases tend to be serious and common diseases tend to be benign.  Or we could list them in order of which ones are easiest to rule out with a simple test or physical exam maneuver or additional question in the history.  You could even limit the list to don’t miss diagnoses to make it shorter, but I think a comprehensive differential diagnosis would be most useful because, when it comes to diagnosis, the clinician has two jobs:  (1) Don’t miss bad diseases and (2) Make the right diagnosis.  You can’t do the second job with just the don’t-miss list.
> 
>  
> 
> John
> 
>  
> 
> From: Mark H Ebell [mailto:ebell at UGA.EDU] 
> Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2015 8:53 AM
> To: IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG
> Subject: Re: [IMPROVEDX] Blog posting on ICD-10 and Diagnosis
> 
>  
> 
> The Europeans, and in particular the Dutch, used this system. I know the Lee Green (Alberta) and Don Nease (Colorado) were working with it and created software around it while at Michigan. And, Henk Lamberts published a series of great articles. I’ve attached a couple, I published the grainy one while I was editor of JFP because I thought it was so important. Unfortunately, Henk died a few years ago.
> 
>  
> 
> Best,
> 
>  
> 
> Mark
> 
>  
> 
> From: Mark Graber <mark.graber at improvediagnosis.org>
> Date: Tuesday, November 10, 2015 at 9:49 AM
> To: Listserv ImproveDx <IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG>, Mark Ebell <ebell at uga.edu>
> Subject: Re: [IMPROVEDX] Blog posting on ICD-10 and Diagnosis
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks to Mark Ebell for calling attention to the WHO's classification system, the International Classification for Primary Care (ICPC-2).  One NICE feature in ICPC-2 is that it captures the reason for the encounter, which would be a huge help to future research on diagnostic error.  We need that !
> 
>  
> 
> Our exclusive use of ICD-10 in the US is a complicating factor in regard to research, because so often a presumptive diagnosis is chosen instead of just the chief complaint.  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> Mark L Graber MD FACP
> President, SIDM  www.improvediagnosis.org
> 
>  
> 
> On Nov 9, 2015, at 8:47 PM, Mark H Ebell <ebell at UGA.EDU> wrote:
> 
>  
> 
> How about:
> 
>  
> 
> http://www.who.int/classifications/icd/adaptations/icpc2/en/
> 
>  
> 
> Mark Ebell
> 
>  
> 
> From: "graber.mark at GMAIL.COM" <graber.mark at GMAIL.COM>
> Reply-To: Society to Improve Diagnosis in Medicine <IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG>, "graber.mark at GMAIL.COM" <graber.mark at GMAIL.COM>
> Date: Monday, November 9, 2015 at 11:08 PM
> To: "IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG" <IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG>
> Subject: [IMPROVEDX] Blog posting on ICD-10 and Diagnosis
> 
>  
> 
> Dr Yul Ejnes (an internist and  past chair of ACP's Board of Regents) has an interesting  blog post on the new ICD-10 coding system.  Echoing the same point made in the IOM report Improving Diagnosis in Health Care, he labels ICD-10 an "absurdly complicated payment 'non-system'" and calls for "alternatives that make getting the diagnosis right more important than selecting the correct code."  
> 
> 
> Mark L Graber MD FACP
> President, Society to Improve Diagnosis in Medicine
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe from IMPROVEDX: click the following link:
> http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1
> 
>  
> 
> or send email to: IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG
> 
> Visit the searchable archives or adjust your subscription at: http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?INDEX
> 
>  
> 
> 
> Moderator:David Meyers, Board Member, Society for Improving Diagnosis in Medicine
> 
> To learn more about SIDM visit:
> http://www.improvediagnosis.org/
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe from IMPROVEDX: click the following link:
> http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1
> 
>  
> 
> or send email to: IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG
> 
> Visit the searchable archives or adjust your subscription at: http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?INDEX
> 
>  
> 
> 
> Moderator:David Meyers, Board Member, Society for Improving Diagnosis in Medicine
> 
> To learn more about SIDM visit:
> http://www.improvediagnosis.org/
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe from IMPROVEDX: click the following link:
> http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1
> 
> or send email to: IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG
> 
> Visit the searchable archives or adjust your subscription at: http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?INDEX
> 
> 
> Moderator:David Meyers, Board Member, Society for Improving Diagnosis in Medicine
> 
> To learn more about SIDM visit:
> http://www.improvediagnosis.org/
> 
> 
> 
> Notice: This UI Health Care e-mail (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is confidential and may be legally privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any retention, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  Please reply to the sender that you have received the message in error, then delete it.  Thank you.
> 
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe from IMPROVEDX: click the following link:
> http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1
> or send email to: IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG
> 
> Visit the searchable archives or adjust your subscription at: http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?INDEX
> 
> Moderator:David Meyers, Board Member, Society for Improving Diagnosis in Medicine
> 
> To learn more about SIDM visit:
> http://www.improvediagnosis.org/






Moderator: David Meyers, Board Member, Society to Improve Diagnosis in Medicine


HTML Version:
URL: <../attachments/20151111/fcb9319d/attachment.html>


More information about the Test mailing list