Wrongology

Twest54973 twest54973 at YAHOO.COM
Mon Jan 11 21:09:10 UTC 2016


Hmmm...
Ever wonder why a CPC wasn't published where they didnt come to the correct dx?
Sounds like publication bias to me??
That would be a good question to ask the editors

Thomas Westover MD

Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 11, 2016, at 2:03 PM, "Jain, Bimal P.,M.D." <BJAIN at PARTNERS.ORG> wrote:

> Mark, thanks for attaching the extremely interesting Times book review.
> We shall make progress in reducing diagnostic errors despite our cognitive biases, I suggest, by first understanding how diagnosis is performed in actual practice. Recently, I examined 50 CPCs in NEJM, which are exercises in diagnosis in real patients writ large and found that a correct diagnosis was made in all CPCs despite complexity of patients discussed. Interestingly, a probabilistic approach was not employed for diagnosis in any CPC. The method employed consisted of construction of an exhaustive differential diagnosis followed by evaluation of each disease in it by how well it explained findings in patient (likelihood inference approach).
>  
> These CPCs have several important lessons for us, I suggest, regarding diagnosis in daily practice:
>  
> (a)    They call into question the relevance of a probabilistic approach which has been prescribed for diagnosis for a long time.
> (b)   The method of exhaustive differential diagnosis and evaluation of each disease in it by its ability to explain patient findings appears to sidestep most or all cognitive biases which have been observed in diagnosis in daily practice.
> (c)    Adoption of this method may improve diagnostic accuracy in daily practice which approaches the accuracy in these CPCs.
>  
> Regards
>  
> Bimal
>  
> Bimal  P Jain MD
> Pulmonary Critical Care
> Northshore Medical Center
> Lynn MA 01904
>  
> From: Mark Graber [mailto:mark.graber at IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG] 
> Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2016 10:00 AM
> To: IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG
> Subject: [IMPROVEDX] Wrongology
>  
>  
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe from IMPROVEDX: click the following link:
> http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1
> or send email to: IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG
> 
> Visit the searchable archives or adjust your subscription at: http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?INDEX
> 
> Moderator:David Meyers, Board Member, Society for Improving Diagnosis in Medicine
> 
> To learn more about SIDM visit:
> http://www.improvediagnosis.org/
> Our movement to reduce diagnostic error faces the reality that these errors are not only common, some or perhaps many are inevitable given the complexity of the diagnostic process and the limits and foibles of our own cognition.  We seem to be ‘hard wired’ to commit the cognitive mistakes that underlie some diagnostic errors. Perhaps the largest challenge we face is the question of whether we can actually improve cognition to avoid these errors. 
> 
> I’m sure everyone who follows our listserv is familiar with Pat Croskerry’s ongoing contributions to this debate through his work on debiasing.  I would like to call to attention several other great reads on this question.  My personal favorite is the bible for the ‘wrongology’ movement, Kathryn Schulz’s book “Being Wrong”.   If you don’t have time to read the book, watch her TED talk. 
> 
> The attached review from the Times discusses two very recent books on this debate, and the review itself is a treat in summarizing the interaction between Daniel Kahneman, who is pessimistic about the possibility of ‘debiasing’, and Steven Pinker, a strong proponent of our capacity to overcome our cognitive biases.
> 
>  
> Mark L Graber MD FACP
> President, SIDM  
> 
>  
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe from IMPROVEDX: click the following link:
> http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1
> or send email to: IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG
> 
> Visit the searchable archives or adjust your subscription at: http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?INDEX
> 
> Moderator:David Meyers, Board Member, Society for Improving Diagnosis in Medicine
> 
> To learn more about SIDM visit:
> http://www.improvediagnosis.org/
> <image001.png>
>  
> 
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe from IMPROVEDX: click the following link:
> http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1
> or send email to: IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG
> 
> Visit the searchable archives or adjust your subscription at: http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?INDEX
> 
> Moderator:David Meyers, Board Member, Society for Improving Diagnosis in Medicine
> 
> To learn more about SIDM visit:
> http://www.improvediagnosis.org/
> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
> dispose of the e-mail.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe from IMPROVEDX: click the following link:
> http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1
> or send email to: IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG
> 
> Visit the searchable archives or adjust your subscription at: http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?INDEX
> 
> Moderator:David Meyers, Board Member, Society for Improving Diagnosis in Medicine
> 
> To learn more about SIDM visit:
> http://www.improvediagnosis.org/






Moderator: David Meyers, Board Member, Society to Improve Diagnosis in Medicine


HTML Version:
URL: <../attachments/20160111/a5b0026a/attachment.html>


More information about the Test mailing list