Support Tests.

Knapp, Lucy LKnapp at PEACEHEALTHLABS.ORG
Mon Jan 25 21:23:15 UTC 2016


That comment is on our PSA, Diagnostic test results. It was created by one of the clinical Chemists working in our system. I agree with the Standardization goal, we’re currently a ways from it but it is always being looked at and improved as we are able. Where ever we can refer doctors to a national standard, such as the AUA with PSA results – we do that. It’s very helpful to get feedback from our doctors as to “things that help” versus “things that contribute to data overload”. We like to try and help with interpretative comments as long as they are helpful. However, it’s difficult for us to see what the physicians perspective. We don’t always know what is extraneous and non-helpful versus what can be very helpful – even critical from the physicians point of view.

We just went through a LIS change here and spent much time rehashing our current interpretations. I like the idea of standardization of forms as long as they standardize to the best and don’t fall to the lowest common denominator. I also really like the idea of physician input into test reporting. We tried to do that as much as possible, but I fear we fell far short of where we should be. We’re still rehashing where we can in response to physician input.

Lucy

Lucy Knapp, MT(ASCP)   |  Technical Specialist, Chemistry  |  Laboratory
PeaceHealth<http://www.peacehealth.org>  |  400 NE Mother Joseph Place  |  Vancouver, WA 98664
office 360-514-2732  |  fax 360-514-1646

From: Sherri Loeb [mailto:sherriloeb at GMAIL.COM]
Sent: Monday, January 25, 2016 12:57 PM
To: IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG
Subject: Re: [IMPROVEDX] Support Tests.

Thanks so all. I am not sure what your mean rob about my American Urological Association comment on my form?

Anyway, keep up the good work.

On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 2:53 PM, robert bell <rmsbell200 at yahoo.com<mailto:rmsbell200 at yahoo.com>> wrote:
Thanks Sherri and Lucy.

It would seem good to work towards greater standardization nation wide.

Sherri your American Urological Association comment on your forms may have prevented the problem that I heard about. I wonder how many lab forms have and do not have that statement?

Also, I notice that different labs use different kinds of forms to report their results. Different font sizes, different additional information, etc. Do these in any way lead to error or prevent error? Standardization here would also be good. But if that does not happen should all forms first tested with say 500 HCPs to see that there are no common errors/misunderstandings that can be easily corrected. Perhaps they are?

Is the laboratory world represented on the Post IOM diagnostic consortium group? If not that would be valuable.

Simple things first!

Rob Bell MD.

On Jan 25, 2016, at 12:41 PM, Sherri Loeb <sherriloeb at GMAIL.COM<mailto:sherriloeb at GMAIL.COM>> wrote:

I find this comment particularly interesting considering my husband passed away from metastatic prostate cancer. One he was diagnosed. We noticed that occasionally his psa was ordered as psa screening to check response to chemo and hormone therapy and other times as psa diagnostic. We were told it is exactly the same. From reading this email, it is obviously not the same.

Thanks for the clear explanation.

Sherri Loeb RN, BSN

On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 1:01 PM, Knapp, Lucy <LKnapp at peacehealthlabs.org<mailto:LKnapp at peacehealthlabs.org>> wrote:
In a word – speaking for the laboratory world – Communicate those needs to your laboratories. As an example, here we have two tests, “PSA, Screening” which has a reference range up to 4 and “PSA, Diagnostic” which also has a reference range of up to 4 but also includes an interpretative comment: “According to the American Urological Association (AUA), serum PSA should decrease and remain at undetectable levels after radical prostatectomy. The AUA defines biochemical recurrence as an initial PSA value of greater than or equal to 0.20 ng/mL followed by a subsequent confirmatory PSA value of greater than or equal to 0.20 ng/mL.”

In a prior life – we had 2 tests with different reference ranges, plus a comment on the PSA, Diagnostic. Both options are easily done in an LIS (lab information system).

We in the laboratory would love to have better communication from physicians – we want to make your lives easier. So my advice to all the physicians out there is to build relationships with the pathologists and laboratory personnel where you practice. Let us know where improvement is needed to the LIS, you need a new test, you need better sensitivity on a current test – whatever.

I’m copying the to our medical director, we are trying to establish better communication with our physicians throughout our system.

Lucy

Lucy Knapp, MT(ASCP)   |  Technical Specialist, Chemistry  |  Laboratory
PeaceHealth<http://www.peacehealth.org/>  |  400 NE Mother Joseph Place  |  Vancouver, WA 98664
office 360-514-2732<tel:360-514-2732>  |  fax 360-514-1646<tel:360-514-1646>

From: robert bell [mailto:0000000296e45ec4-dmarc-request at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG<mailto:0000000296e45ec4-dmarc-request at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG>]
Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2016 1:56 PM
To: IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG<mailto:IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG>
Subject: [IMPROVEDX] Support Tests.

I have suggested that at the same time, or even before we tackle Errors in Diagnosis, we see that all our support diagnostic tests (Lab, X-ray, etc.) are in good order so as to help make the correct diagnoses more often.

I have been made aware that it is easy to miss a low but rising PSA in someone who has had a past radical prostatectomy.

The Lab reports results as ng/mL with a reference range of (0.000 - 4.000). The range for someone with a prostate present.

I asked myself with all the technology is there anything that could be done to prevent such happenings?

And then I thought there must be 100s of similar situations when time, disease, surgery, treatments, etc effect lab interpretations - the PSA lab reports on the ones I have seen do not mention that the ranges are for someone with a prostate. Should they?

Yes, good clinical skills would help but could the lab with or without technology do anything to help avoid such problems?  Could training or anything else help prevent?

I wondered how often this happens - and if you decided to do something about it, could you triage it - presumably not without good error data!?

Robert Bell




________________________________

Address messages to: IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG<mailto:IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG>

To unsubscribe from IMPROVEDX: click the following link:
http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1<https://mail2.peacehealth.org/enduser/classify_url.html?url=P4JeiEdQ8JXS0jGbSQNeoCNP5x6BIz6Aj0TpSUpjJFwveji9BsZVeZFgSweiLOutgugZP9kVnYEPuFAsUQb2hEZA9boc5hH3cvuDGw+3Y8w=>
or send email to: IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG<mailto:IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG>

Visit the searchable archives or adjust your subscription at: http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?INDEX<https://mail2.peacehealth.org/enduser/classify_url.html?url=P4JeiEdQ8JXS0jGbSQNeoCNP5x6BIz6Aj0TpSUpjJFwveji9BsZVeZFgSweiLOut1oRyX1aojj961DlpykqPpQ==>

Moderator:David Meyers, Board Member, Society for Improving Diagnosis in Medicine

To learn more about SIDM visit:
http://www.improvediagnosis.org/<https://mail2.peacehealth.org/enduser/classify_url.html?url=UrssAVhvAA8+5X8SGb6C6Q3NYgMkGqkpG69iRlENxV70c1bGrHTHokhXvG7YFN7l>

This message is intended solely for the use of the individual and entity to whom it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable state and federal laws. If you are not the addressee, or are not authorized to receive for the intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you may not use, copy, distribute, or disclose to anyone this message or the information contained herein. If you have received this message in error, immediately advise the sender by reply email and destroy this message.

________________________________

Address messages to: IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG<mailto:IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG>

To unsubscribe from IMPROVEDX: click the following link:
http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1<https://mail2.peacehealth.org/enduser/classify_url.html?url=P4JeiEdQ8JXS0jGbSQNeoCNP5x6BIz6Aj0TpSUpjJFwveji9BsZVeZFgSweiLOutgugZP9kVnYEPuFAsUQb2hGFFy1pfDsM0NC2QgqrOBW21mWOjE9KzlaNVUmAWkMKQ> or send email to: IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG<mailto:IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG>

Visit the searchable archives or adjust your subscription at: http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?INDEX<https://mail2.peacehealth.org/enduser/classify_url.html?url=P4JeiEdQ8JXS0jGbSQNeoCNP5x6BIz6Aj0TpSUpjJFwveji9BsZVeZFgSweiLOut1oRyX1aojj961DlpykqPpQ==>
Moderator:David Meyers, Board Member, Society for Improving Diagnosis in Medicine

To learn more about SIDM visit:
http://www.improvediagnosis.org/<https://mail2.peacehealth.org/enduser/classify_url.html?url=UrssAVhvAA8+5X8SGb6C6Q3NYgMkGqkpG69iRlENxV70c1bGrHTHokhXvG7YFN7l>


________________________________

Address messages to: IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG<mailto:IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG>

To unsubscribe from IMPROVEDX: click the following link:
http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1<https://mail2.peacehealth.org/enduser/classify_url.html?url=P4JeiEdQ8JXS0jGbSQNeoCNP5x6BIz6Aj0TpSUpjJFwveji9BsZVeZFgSweiLOutgugZP9kVnYEPuFAsUQb2hGFFy1pfDsM0NC2QgqrOBW21mWOjE9KzlaNVUmAWkMKQ>

or send email to: IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG<mailto:IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG>

Visit the searchable archives or adjust your subscription at: http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?INDEX<https://mail2.peacehealth.org/enduser/classify_url.html?url=P4JeiEdQ8JXS0jGbSQNeoCNP5x6BIz6Aj0TpSUpjJFwveji9BsZVeZFgSweiLOut1oRyX1aojj961DlpykqPpQ==>


Moderator:David Meyers, Board Member, Society for Improving Diagnosis in Medicine

To learn more about SIDM visit:
http://www.improvediagnosis.org/<https://mail2.peacehealth.org/enduser/classify_url.html?url=UrssAVhvAA8+5X8SGb6C6Q3NYgMkGqkpG69iRlENxV70c1bGrHTHokhXvG7YFN7l>


Robert M. Bell, M.D., Ph.C.
P.O. Box 3668
West Sedona, AZ  86340-3668
USA
Tel: Fax: 928 203-4517<tel:928%20203-4517>





________________________________

Address messages to: IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG<mailto:IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG>

To unsubscribe from IMPROVEDX: click the following link:
http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1<https://mail2.peacehealth.org/enduser/classify_url.html?url=P4JeiEdQ8JXS0jGbSQNeoCNP5x6BIz6Aj0TpSUpjJFwveji9BsZVeZFgSweiLOutgugZP9kVnYEPuFAsUQb2hEZA9boc5hH3cvuDGw+3Y8w=>
or send email to: IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG<mailto:IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG>

Visit the searchable archives or adjust your subscription at: http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?INDEX

Moderator:David Meyers, Board Member, Society for Improving Diagnosis in Medicine

To learn more about SIDM visit:
http://www.improvediagnosis.org/

To unsubscribe from the IMPROVEDX:
mail to:IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG
or click the following link: IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG

Address messages to: IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG

For additional information and subscription commands, visit:
http://www.lsoft.com/resources/faq.asp#4A

http://LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG/ (with your password)

Visit the searchable archives or adjust your subscription at:
http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?INDEX

Moderator: David Meyers, Board Member, Society to Improve Diagnosis in Medicine

To unsubscribe from the IMPROVEDX list, click the following link:<br>
<a href="http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1" target="_blank">http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1</a>
</p>

HTML Version:
URL: <../attachments/20160125/5be41120/attachment.html>


More information about the Test mailing list