The Dangers of Copy and Paste in the EHR

Swerlick, Robert A rswerli at EMORY.EDU
Sat Oct 22 13:25:02 UTC 2016


I believe the cut and past phenomena and the concerns raised miss an important point. When a patient is seen over time, what information MUST be carried forward in order to manage the patient? I certainly should not be in a position where when I see a patient back I walk in the room totally ignorant of their history and course other than what I remember from recall.


What information should ALWAYS be carried forward and where should this reside within the record. Cut and paste is a convenient but flawed approach to a real problem which does not have a tool within EHR's which allows for ready access to information we should all have when we have a encounter and are called upon to make clinical decisions.


Before we condemn the cut and paste practice wholesale, we need to consider what alternatives exist to replace the functions it fulfills.


Robert A. Swerlick, MD
Alicia Leizman Stonecipher Chair of Dermatology
Professor and Chairman, Department of Dermatology
Emory University School of Medicine
404-727-3669
________________________________
From: HM Epstein <hmepstein at GMAIL.COM>
Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2016 1:16:14 AM
To: IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG
Subject: [IMPROVEDX] The Dangers of Copy and Paste in the EHR

 ​I was surprised by this report from ECRI. They did a retrospective look at EHRs and found only 7.4% used cut-and-paste​. However, of that small sample, 36% of the cut-and-paste entries contributed to Dx error.

Based on all of the complaints I've read about cut-and-paste use in EHRs, I truly expected to see that the incidence was much higher. Has anyone seen other studies to compare to this? Does it accurately reflect your expectations from your own observations in your place of work?

Thank you.

Best,
Helene

http://www.diagnosticimaging.com/ehr/dangers-copy-and-paste-ehr

The Dangers of Copy and Paste in the EHR
October 21, 2016
By Erica Sprey<http://www.diagnosticimaging.com/authors/erica-sprey>

By nature of design, EHR systems encourage physician users to copy old patient data, like medication lists and chronic conditions, and copy and paste the information into the current note. In doing so there are benefits and risks for both physicians and patients, according to Lorraine Possanza, DPM, JD, and Robert Giannini, NHA, of the nonprofit ECRI Institute<https://www.ecri.org/Pages/default.aspx>. Possanza and Giannini were co-presenters at the American Health Information Management Association's (AHIMA<http://www.ahima.org/>) annual conference in Baltimore, Md., held on Oct. 17, speaking on "Safe Practices for Copy and Paste."

The ECRI Institute's mission is to provide physicians and other health professionals evidence-based guidelines on the most effective medical procedures, devices, and drugs, via scientific research. In order to understand the affect that potentially unsafe practices like "copy and paste" have on patient safety, ECRI applies a three-prong approach, says Possanza. This includes data collection; data analytics; and leveraged learning that reaches out to both EHR vendors and medical staff.

While reporting can seem onerous to overworked staff, it is vital to understand the extent of the problem. Possanza provided conference attendees an example where copy and paste can hinder the physician and her staff as she treats a hospitalized patient who suffers from pressure ulcers. If the initial assessment is copied and pasted forward in the note on subsequent patient visits, the physician does not have a true picture of the progression of the ulcers and may not trust the validity of the information in the note.

Copy and paste also contributes to "note bloat" says Possanza, making it difficult for a physician to pick out pertinent information that is swallowed up by redundant information. It is vital that patient information is accurate, timely, and easily assessable she says, adding that a dense note can contribute to diagnostic error.

The ECRI Institute did a retrospective study on diagnostic error that found 7.4 percent of audited charts contained copy and paste information, and of that group, 36 percent contributed to diagnostic error. "How does copy and paste influence [diagnostic error]? Through note bloat, through those internal inconsistencies, through the propagation of errors," says Possanza. "If I pasted information and it's incorrect and I repeatedly paste that information that is incorrect, I now have errors that are propagated."

In order to minimize the chances of error, Possanza says physicians and other clinicians must be accurate in their notes, concisely document the patient information, attribute where copy and paste material came from, and give context where appropriate.

It is essential that physicians and other medical staff feel that they can report health information technology (HIT) related-errors in a non-punitive environment, so that management can address any systemic problems. And it is also equally important that staff are trained on copy and paste best practices. To that end, the Partnership for HIT Patient Safety<https://www.ecri.org/resource-center/Pages/HITPartnership.aspx> has released the first "Health IT Safe Practices: Toolkit for the Safe Use of Copy and Paste,"<https://www.ecri.org/Resources/HIT/CP_Toolkit/Toolkit_CopyPaste_final.pdf> which examines the scope of the problem, defines the various stakeholders and provides safe-practice guidelines for providers.

The Partnership has developed four recommendations for providers and their staff, says Possanza:

A: Provide a mechanism to make copy and paste material easily identifiable;

B: Ensure that the provenance (and chronology) of copy and paste material is readily available;

C: Ensure adequate staff training and education regarding the appropriate and safe use of copy and paste; and

D: Ensure that copy and paste practices are regularly monitored, measured, and assessed.




________________________________

Address messages to: IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG

To unsubscribe from IMPROVEDX: click the following link:
http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1

or send email to: IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG

Visit the searchable archives or adjust your subscription at: http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?INDEX

Moderator:David Meyers, Board Member, Society for Improving Diagnosis in Medicine

To learn more about SIDM visit:
http://www.improvediagnosis.org/

________________________________

This e-mail message (including any attachments) is for the sole use of
the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged
information. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution
or copying of this message (including any attachments) is strictly
prohibited.

If you have received this message in error, please contact
the sender by reply e-mail message and destroy all copies of the
original message (including attachments).

To unsubscribe from the IMPROVEDX:
mail to:IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG
or click the following link: IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG

Address messages to: IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG

For additional information and subscription commands, visit:
http://www.lsoft.com/resources/faq.asp#4A

http://LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG/ (with your password)

Visit the searchable archives or adjust your subscription at:
http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?INDEX

Moderator: David Meyers, Board Member, Society to Improve Diagnosis in Medicine

To unsubscribe from the IMPROVEDX list, click the following link:<br>
<a href="http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1" target="_blank">http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1</a>
</p>

HTML Version:
URL: <../attachments/20161022/19b05b3f/attachment.html>


More information about the Test mailing list