The Dangers of Copy and Paste in the EHR

Edward Winslow edbjwinslow at GMAIL.COM
Wed Oct 26 16:19:05 UTC 2016


One of the reasons for copy and paste is for billing. C&P helps getting
enough components in the note to justify billing. At one point this was a
major function of an EMR (remember?). Statements such as "FH reviewed and
confirmed and does/does not contribute" might indicate that one has
considered those data in formulating an opinion.
Maybe we might look at trying to change some billing functions or
requirements
Ted

On Oct 22, 2016 1:14 PM, "Swerlick, Robert A" <rswerli at emory.edu> wrote:
>
> I believe the cut and past phenomena and the concerns raised miss an
important point. When a patient is seen over time, what information MUST be
carried forward in order to manage the patient? I certainly should not be
in a position where when I see a patient back I walk in the room totally
ignorant of their history and course other than what I remember from recall.
>
>
> What information should ALWAYS be carried forward and where should this
reside within the record. Cut and paste is a convenient but flawed approach
to a real problem which does not have a tool within EHR's which allows for
ready access to information we should all have when we have a encounter and
are called upon to make clinical decisions.
>
>
> Before we condemn the cut and paste practice wholesale, we need to
consider what alternatives exist to replace the functions it fulfills.
>
>
> Robert A. Swerlick, MD
> Alicia Leizman Stonecipher Chair of Dermatology
> Professor and Chairman, Department of Dermatology
> Emory University School of Medicine
> 404-727-3669
> ________________________________
> From: HM Epstein <hmepstein at GMAIL.COM>
> Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2016 1:16:14 AM
> To: IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG
> Subject: [IMPROVEDX] The Dangers of Copy and Paste in the EHR
>
>  ​I was surprised by this report from ECRI. They did a retrospective look
at EHRs and found only 7.4% used cut-and-paste​. However, of that small
sample, 36% of the cut-and-paste entries contributed to Dx error.
>
> Based on all of the complaints I've read about cut-and-paste use in EHRs,
I truly expected to see that the incidence was much higher. Has anyone seen
other studies to compare to this? Does it accurately reflect your
expectations from your own observations in your place of work?
>
> Thank you.
>
> Best,
> Helene
>
> http://www.diagnosticimaging.com/ehr/dangers-copy-and-paste-ehr
>
> The Dangers of Copy and Paste in the EHR
> October 21, 2016
> By Erica Sprey
>
> By nature of design, EHR systems encourage physician users to copy old
patient data, like medication lists and chronic conditions, and copy and
paste the information into the current note. In doing so there are benefits
and risks for both physicians and patients, according to Lorraine Possanza,
DPM, JD, and Robert Giannini, NHA, of the nonprofit ECRI Institute.
Possanza and Giannini were co-presenters at the American Health Information
Management Association's (AHIMA) annual conference in Baltimore, Md., held
on Oct. 17, speaking on "Safe Practices for Copy and Paste."
>
> The ECRI Institute's mission is to provide physicians and other health
professionals evidence-based guidelines on the most effective medical
procedures, devices, and drugs, via scientific research. In order to
understand the affect that potentially unsafe practices like "copy and
paste" have on patient safety, ECRI applies a three-prong approach, says
Possanza. This includes data collection; data analytics; and leveraged
learning that reaches out to both EHR vendors and medical staff.
>
> While reporting can seem onerous to overworked staff, it is vital to
understand the extent of the problem. Possanza provided conference
attendees an example where copy and paste can hinder the physician and her
staff as she treats a hospitalized patient who suffers from pressure
ulcers. If the initial assessment is copied and pasted forward in the note
on subsequent patient visits, the physician does not have a true picture of
the progression of the ulcers and may not trust the validity of the
information in the note.
>
> Copy and paste also contributes to "note bloat" says Possanza, making it
difficult for a physician to pick out pertinent information that is
swallowed up by redundant information. It is vital that patient information
is accurate, timely, and easily assessable she says, adding that a dense
note can contribute to diagnostic error.
>
> The ECRI Institute did a retrospective study on diagnostic error that
found 7.4 percent of audited charts contained copy and paste information,
and of that group, 36 percent contributed to diagnostic error. "How does
copy and paste influence [diagnostic error]? Through note bloat, through
those internal inconsistencies, through the propagation of errors," says
Possanza. "If I pasted information and it's incorrect and I repeatedly
paste that information that is incorrect, I now have errors that are
propagated."
>
> In order to minimize the chances of error, Possanza says physicians and
other clinicians must be accurate in their notes, concisely document the
patient information, attribute where copy and paste material came from, and
give context where appropriate.
>
> It is essential that physicians and other medical staff feel that they
can report health information technology (HIT) related-errors in a
non-punitive environment, so that management can address any systemic
problems. And it is also equally important that staff are trained on copy
and paste best practices. To that end, the Partnership for HIT Patient
Safety has released the first "Health IT Safe Practices: Toolkit for the
Safe Use of Copy and Paste," which examines the scope of the problem,
defines the various stakeholders and provides safe-practice guidelines for
providers.
>
> The Partnership has developed four recommendations for providers and
their staff, says Possanza:
>
> A: Provide a mechanism to make copy and paste material easily
identifiable;
>
> B: Ensure that the provenance (and chronology) of copy and paste material
is readily available;
>
> C: Ensure adequate staff training and education regarding the appropriate
and safe use of copy and paste; and
>
> D: Ensure that copy and paste practices are regularly monitored,
measured, and assessed.
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
>
> To unsubscribe from IMPROVEDX: click the following link:
>
http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1
>
> or send email to: IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG
>
>
>
> Moderator:David Meyers, Board Member, Society for Improving Diagnosis in
Medicine
>
> To learn more about SIDM visit:
> http://www.improvediagnosis.org/
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> This e-mail message (including any attachments) is for the sole use of
> the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged
> information. If the reader of this message is not the intended
> recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution
> or copying of this message (including any attachments) is strictly
> prohibited.
>
> If you have received this message in error, please contact
> the sender by reply e-mail message and destroy all copies of the
> original message (including attachments).
>
> ________________________________
>
>
> To unsubscribe from IMPROVEDX: click the following link:
>
http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1
or send email to: IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG
>
> Moderator:David Meyers, Board Member, Society for Improving Diagnosis in
Medicine
>
> To learn more about SIDM visit:
> http://www.improvediagnosis.org/






Moderator: David Meyers, Board Member, Society to Improve Diagnosis in Medicine


HTML Version:
URL: <../attachments/20161026/e9ad1018/attachment.html>


More information about the Test mailing list