Process breakdowns in diagnosis

Phillip Benton pgbentonmd at AOL.COM
Thu Dec 1 23:46:34 UTC 2016


The CMO has the delegated responsibility to keep things moving in the right direction at a reasonable speed, by virtue of his/her job description, but it is the CEO's employer (the HC institution) who issues the CEO's paycheck that has the responsibility to make whole those wrongfully injured by the CEO's negligent screw-ups. This assumes there is no statuatry immunity, as there sometimes is with governmental institutions.
 
Phillip Benton, MD, JD
pgbentonmd at aol.com

 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Jason Maude <jason.maude at ISABELHEALTHCARE.COM>
To: IMPROVEDX <IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG>
Sent: Thu, Dec 1, 2016 4:29 pm
Subject: Re: [IMPROVEDX] Process breakdowns in diagnosis




This is a really important question- who is responsible for the quality and standard of diagnosis quality in an institution? Shouldn’t the CMO be responsible for the overall standard of clinical care which includes diagnosis? If there isn’t this clarity, as implied below, then that’s where the problem starts. There has to be somebody who is responsible to drive the process forward.


Regards
 


Jason Maude
Founder and CEO Isabel Healthcare
Tel: +44 1428 644886
Tel: +1 703 879 1890
www.isabelhealthcare.com





From: "Hess, Dr. Donald" <dhess at SUSQUEHANNAHEALTH.ORG>
Reply-To: Society to Improve Diagnosis in Medicine <IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG>, "Hess, Dr. Donald" <dhess at SUSQUEHANNAHEALTH.ORG>
Date: Thursday, 1 December 2016 12:15
To: "IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG" <IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG>
Subject: [IMPROVEDX] Process breakdowns in diagnosis





Greetings Mark:
 
Thanks for your important reminder that diagnosis is a process. Even though we tend to think of it as a noun, one that reduces to an ICD number, it is essentially a verb.
 
The diagnostic process is deeply embedded into other organizational processes, e.g. patient throughput, standardized protocols, EHR documentation, etc. More importantly, it is also blended into the interpersonal information exchange amongst clinicians, patients & families. Perhaps this “hiddenness” explains why it has taken so long to recognize the importance of the diagnostic process relative to the quality of care.
 
Who owns the process? It is broadly distributed.
 
Who defends the integrity of the process? To the extent that ownership is broadly distributed, likewise the responsibility.
 
For example, when a quality improvement initiative is being planned, who will ask: “What are the potential adverse consequences to the diagnostic process”?  
 

Regards, Don
 
Dr. Donald Hess

 

From: Mark Graber [mailto:graber.mark at GMAIL.COM]
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2016 2:22 PM
To: IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG
Subject: [IMPROVEDX] Process breakdowns in diagnosis

 
One of the major messages in the IOM report was that diagnosis is a PROCESS.  Quality improvement work then becomes possible by examining and addressing the process breakdowns that contribute to errors and harm.

 

The attached article from Saul Weingart & associates is a terrific illustration of how much can be learned from this approach.  With permission of the publisher, its our pleasure to forward this article, and an accompanying editorial by Hardeep Singh, in advance of their appearing online (soon !) in the Joint Commission Journal.   Both of these articles have important messages.

 

 

 




To unsubscribe from IMPROVEDX: click the following link:
http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1
or send email to: IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG

Visit the searchable archives or adjust your subscription at: http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?INDEX

Moderator:David Meyers, Board Member, Society for Improving Diagnosis in Medicine

To learn more about SIDM visit:
http://www.improvediagnosis.org/




To unsubscribe from IMPROVEDX: click the following link:
http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1
or send email to: IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG

Visit the searchable archives or adjust your subscription at: http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?INDEX

Moderator:David Meyers, Board Member, Society for Improving Diagnosis in Medicine

To learn more about SIDM visit:
http://www.improvediagnosis.org/





To unsubscribe from IMPROVEDX: click the following link:
http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1
 or send email to: IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG

Visit the searchable archives or adjust your subscription at: http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?INDEX

Moderator:David Meyers, Board Member, Society for Improving Diagnosis in Medicine

To learn more about SIDM visit:
http://www.improvediagnosis.org/








Moderator: David Meyers, Board Member, Society to Improve Diagnosis in Medicine


HTML Version:
URL: <../attachments/20161201/0e86a0d0/attachment.html>


More information about the Test mailing list