lberlin at LIVE.COM
Mon Dec 12 15:47:41 UTC 2016
I'm a radiologist and not an ED doc, but I think my answer is short, simple, and applies to all physicians under the circumstances you describe, namely:
Read all three guidelines carefully, and then use your own judgment to determine what you believe to be the standard of care, and then treat the patient accordingly.
From: Tom Benzoni <benzonit at GMAIL.COM>
Sent: Monday, December 12, 2016 7:30 AM
To: IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG
Subject: [IMPROVEDX] guidelines
3 societies publish guidelines on ER treatment of A fib.
ESC, ACC, Canada
-Give strong recommendations based on weak evidence (their own finding) of expert opinion, not clinical trials
-Among 21 questions addressed, 5 completely different recommendations, 6 partial agreements, 10 agreements
-Only 1 group recommended absence of conflict of interest for >50% of its panel.
-Take the result with which you disagree, find a guideline that agrees with you and pronounce the care bad
-Do the opposite
Poclaim guidelines are useless and take pity on the person having to select these at the point of care?
To unsubscribe from IMPROVEDX: click the following link:
or send email to: IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG
Visit the searchable archives or adjust your subscription at: http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?INDEX
Moderator:David Meyers, Board Member, Society for Improving Diagnosis in Medicine
To learn more about SIDM visit:
Moderator: David Meyers, Board Member, Society to Improve Diagnosis in Medicine
More information about the Test