AI "Machine Learning" Approaches to the diagnosis of sepsis

Robert Bell rmsbell200 at YAHOO.COM
Mon Mar 6 15:57:49 UTC 2017


Thanks Michael and Jason,

One thing that I have always felt is that the importance of time is not fully recognized by HCPs when managing sepsis. Do the algorithms focus on the importance of prompt treatment?

Rob Bell

Sent from my iPad

On Mar 6, 2017, at 7:08 AM, "Bruno, Michael" <mbruno at PENNSTATEHEALTH.PSU.EDU> wrote:

> HI Jason,
> 
>  
> 
> There is actually considerable work being done on the idea of using information technology, specifically on the use of AI “Machine-learning algorithms,” for improving the speed and accuracy of the diagnosis of Sepsis. I recently learned that the timely diagnosis of sepsis has been recognized as being a particularly challenging problem as long ago as the 16th Century—it was actually mentioned in the writings of Niccolò Machiavelli (1429-1527)!  
> 
>  
> 
> We have a group here at Hershey, led by Dr. Marco Huesch, Radiology’s Vice Chair for Research, working on the use of machine-learning algorithms for rapid detection of sepsis in ED patients.  Similar work is being undertaken at Johns Hopkins and elsewhere (see the attached manuscript).  The JHU group is focused on ICU patients.
> 
>  
> 
> Mike
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> Michael A. Bruno, M.S., M.D., F.A.C.R.   
> Professor of Radiology & Medicine
> 
> Vice Chair for Quality & Patient Safety
> 
> Chief, Division of Emergency Radiology
> 
> Department of Radiology, H-066
> 
> Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
> 
> 500 University Drive, Hershey PA 17033
> ( (717) 531-8703  |   6 (717) 531-5737
> 
> * mbruno at pennstatehealth.psu.edu  
> 
> <image001.png>
> 
> *****E-Mail Confidentiality Notice*****
> This message (including any attachments) contains information intended for a specific individual(s) and purpose that may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure pursuant to applicable law.  Any inappropriate use, distribution or copying of the message is strictly prohibited and may subject you to criminal or civil penalty.  If you have received this transmission in error, please reply to the sender indicating this error and delete the transmission from your system immediately.
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> From: Phillip Benton [mailto:0000000697ec7b18-dmarc-request at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG] 
> Sent: Saturday, March 04, 2017 4:52 PM
> To: IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG
> Subject: [IMPROVEDX] Computer analysis of probable Root Cause/Contributing Cause(s) of preventable patient deaths using elecctronic medical records.
> 
>  
> 
> Jason,
> 
>  
> 
> As a physician-attorney now devoting all of my remaining time to improving medical quality by decreasing medical error, I applaud your great and continuing efforts.
> 
>  
> 
> I am exploring the possibility of creating a system that reverse engineers from decisions on Dx and Rx and would like your thoughts: If we know the adverse event [patient death after 6 days illness with undiagnosed (until autopsy) septic peritonitis from diverticulitis with occult rupture] is there any computer program in existence or under development that can input the recorded clinical and pathologic facts to deduce a probability hierarchy of medical errors that would have led to this patients death? In effect, is there software to do probable
> 
> 'root-cause analysis' based strictly upon the digitized medical record (H&P, imaging, labs, consultant opinions, path reports)?
> 
>  
> 
> She was first misdiagnosed as "constipation" on the first ER visit for severe abdominal pain, then again misdiagnosed as "atypical cardiac pain" on ER visit 3 days later. Acute abdomen "signs" were present but not classic, not uncommon for a 72 YO with an aging immune system.  She was admitted and had negative cardiac consultation but no further diagnostic studies, then died 23 hours after admission with cardiovascular collapse from undiagnosed sepsis.
> 
>  
> 
> If this type computer retro-analysis were possible, the next step would be to investigate to confirm and then to correct the human and systems errors. Of course an experienced physician(s) has to put it all into context at the end, but just trying to piece together an exact chronology is very difficult, even for top (Harvard & Yale) reviewing medical experts, with our new  electronic hospital records systems. Could 'Watson' or 'Isabel' not do it more quickly?
> 
> Thanks,  PGB 
> 
>  
> 
> Phillip Benton, MD, JD
> 
> Atlanta Medical Center
> pgbentonmd at aol.com
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe from IMPROVEDX: click the following link:
> http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1
> 
> or send email to: IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG
> 
> Visit the searchable archives or adjust your subscription at: http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?INDEX
> 
> 
> Moderator:David Meyers, Board Member, Society for Improving Diagnosis in Medicine
> 
> To learn more about SIDM visit:
> http://www.improvediagnosis.org/
> 
> 
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe from IMPROVEDX: click the following link:
> http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1
> or send email to: IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG
> 
> Visit the searchable archives or adjust your subscription at: http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?INDEX
> 
> Moderator:David Meyers, Board Member, Society for Improving Diagnosis in Medicine
> 
> To learn more about SIDM visit:
> http://www.improvediagnosis.org/
> <The TREW Score.pdf>






Moderator: David Meyers, Board Member, Society to Improve Diagnosis in Medicine


HTML Version:
URL: <../attachments/20170306/a83ae5f7/attachment.html>


More information about the Test mailing list