Computer analysis of probable Root Cause/Contributing Cause(s) of preventable patient deaths using elecctronic medical records.
woods.2 at OSU.EDU
Mon Mar 6 16:29:04 UTC 2017
The question posed provides an opportunity to recalibrate some of the discussions about diagnosis. At the beginning of the patient safety movement, two of the three basic values we articulated were: to move beyond blame and to adopt a systems approach. The discussion has surfaced the desire to have a computer automatically (or to have a computer aided mechanism) to trace back from adverse event to cause. This falls into the hindsight bias trap which has plagued and undermine the ability to learn after adverse events. Tracing backwards from outcome in search of cause guarantees hindsight bias, and hindsight bias will lead to oversimplifications. The oversimplifications will inevitably lead to a component not a systems view and will focus on people and blame. This is laid out in the book Behind Human Error (originally 1994 / 2nd edition 2010), and overcoming hindsight bias was one of the important messages during those early days and the rise of the patient safety movement 1995 to 2000.
The key is to trace forward based on the nature of cues, possibilities, uncertainties, expectations, norms, work activities, etc. This is laid out in Behind Human Error and then in the later Field Guide to Human Error Investigation by Dekker.
Today there are two major threads in safety related to the original work on escaping the hindsight bias. One is captured in the phrase — "the difference between work as imagined and work as done.” This phrase is used to highlight that improving safety should focus on what usually goes right and what people do in order to make things work. For example blameless postmortems are being used by many capture a much wider range of information about how the system normally works the difficulties it faces pressures that operates under and how the system really works. Breakdowns and incidents provide opportunities to learn about how the system really works so that I can be modified in ways the function better given the real pressures and resource limitations. The second relates to the failure to truly see systemic factors rather than faulty components - usually people. As one health care manager said, “ system, what’s a system? I can’t blame a system.” This tendency to adopt a systems approach rhetorically, but to continue to analyze adverse events is due to component breakdowns is widespread across industries (or the systems factors become vague category labels like communication). As a result, variety of techniques of been developed (e.g., STAMP and FRAM and others) and are being used to try to facilitate true systems thinking especially as part of proactive safety management. A good resource is the PreAccident Podcast series by Todd Conklin http://preaccidentpodcast.podbean.com
The basic points are:
~ to remind people about the contamination that comes from the hindsight bias,
~ tracing backwards from known outcome guarantees hindsight bias and oversimplifications which block learning.
The second part of the comment is — how can computers help us understand diagnostic process looking forward, not backward, and provide insight about the difficulties and vulnerabilities given the wide variety and diversity of clinical situations that can be included under the general label of diagnosis. This is a quite interesting topic and one that requires weeding away some of the assumptions and misunderstandings that are mixed up in the discussions about improving diagnosis in health care. But that is for another post.
Releasing the Adaptive Power of Human Systems
Department of Integrated Systems Engineering
The Ohio State University
Resilience Engineering Association
Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
SAVE the DATE
7th Biennial International Symposium on Resilience Engineering
Liège Belgium, June 26-29, 2017
woods.2 at osu dot edu
SNAFU Catchers Consortium
keynote on autonomy and people see
part 1: https://youtu.be/b8xEpjW0Sqk part 2: https://youtu.be/as0LipGTm5s part 3: https://youtu.be/2GEsxMuLWIE
keynotes on resilience and complexity see
On Mar 4, 2017, at 4:52 PM, Phillip Benton <0000000697ec7b18-dmarc-request at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG<mailto:0000000697ec7b18-dmarc-request at list.improvediagnosis.org>> wrote:
As a physician-attorney now devoting all of my remaining time to improving medical quality by decreasing medical error, I applaud your great and continuing efforts.
I am exploring the possibility of creating a system that reverse engineers from decisions on Dx and Rx and would like your thoughts: If we know the adverse event [patient death after 6 days illness with undiagnosed (until autopsy) septic peritonitis from diverticulitis with occult rupture] is there any computer program in existence or under development that can input the recorded clinical and pathologic facts to deduce a probability hierarchy of medical errors that would have led to this patients death? In effect, is there software to do probable
'root-cause analysis' based strictly upon the digitized medical record (H&P, imaging, labs, consultant opinions, path reports)?
She was first misdiagnosed as "constipation" on the first ER visit for severe abdominal pain, then again misdiagnosed as "atypical cardiac pain" on ER visit 3 days later. Acute abdomen "signs" were present but not classic, not uncommon for a 72 YO with an aging immune system. She was admitted and had negative cardiac consultation but no further diagnostic studies, then died 23 hours after admission with cardiovascular collapse from undiagnosed sepsis.
If this type computer retro-analysis were possible, the next step would be to investigate to confirm and then to correct the human and systems errors. Of course an experienced physician(s) has to put it all into context at the end, but just trying to piece together an exact chronology is very difficult, even for top (Harvard & Yale) reviewing medical experts, with our new electronic hospital records systems. Could 'Watson' or 'Isabel' not do it more quickly?
Phillip Benton, MD, JD
Atlanta Medical Center
pgbentonmd at aol.com<mailto:pgbentonmd at aol.com>
Address messages to: IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG<mailto:IMPROVEDX at list.improvediagnosis.org>
To unsubscribe from IMPROVEDX: click the following link:
or send email to: IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG<mailto:IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at list.improvediagnosis.org>
Visit the searchable archives or adjust your subscription at: http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?INDEX
Moderator:David Meyers, Board Member, Society for Improving Diagnosis in Medicine
To learn more about SIDM visit:
To unsubscribe from the IMPROVEDX:
mail to:IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG
or click the following link: IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG
Address messages to: IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG
For additional information and subscription commands, visit:
http://LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG/ (with your password)
Visit the searchable archives or adjust your subscription at:
Moderator: David Meyers, Board Member, Society to Improve Diagnosis in Medicine
To unsubscribe from the IMPROVEDX list, click the following link:<br>
<a href="http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1" target="_blank">http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1</a>
More information about the Test