Doctor lectures Valley health professionals on dangers of errors | Local News | dailyitem.com

HM Epstein hmepstein at GMAIL.COM
Fri May 12 15:07:59 UTC 2017


​I rather like "Liar, liar, pants on fire." Perhaps it's the appropriate
response to every Fake News or media lie. And if I were the reporter
writing this article or one of the doctors in the audience, I would ask him
to cite his sources. However, when the message is --​ ​surprisingly --​
​still new to the majority of the medical community, do we need to control
the message? ​And if we do, *how* do we do that? SIDM is still mainly
volunteer so no one has the time to respond to every errant speaker or
poorly sourced article.

Any brainstorms?

Best,
Helene


Helene's Website <http://hmepstein.com/>
Helene's Twitter Account <https://twitter.com/hmepstein>
Diagnostic Error's Twitter Account <https://twitter.com/DxErrors>
Diagnostic Errors on Facebook <https://www.facebook.com/DiagnosticErrors/>
​
Helene on LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/helenekepstein/>
​

On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 10:56 AM, Rob Bell <rmsbell200 at yahoo.com> wrote:

> Brings up the idea of what is FAKE NEWS in the diagnostic world. And how
> much of it is there?
>
> Rob Bell, MD
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On May 12, 2017, at 5:27 AM, HM Epstein <hmepstein at GMAIL.COM> wrote:
>
> While we want people in the medical field to talk about preventing
> diagnostic and medical errors, how do we handle it when the speaker is
> using inaccurate and inflated statistics? For example, Dr. David Nash is
> quoted in this article as telling a room full of doctors, “I know you
> won’t believe this,” he said, “but every American in 2016, had a
> misdiagnosis or late diagnosis when they visited a doctor in an office.
> Every American.”
>
> Best,
> Helene
>
> http://www.dailyitem.com/content/tncms/live/
>
> Doctor lectures Valley health professionals on dangers of errors
> Rick Dandes <https://www.dailyitem.com/users/profile/Rick%20Dandes>6 hrs
> ago
>
> LEWISBURG — The idea that medical errors are the third leading cause of
> death in the United States might have surprised many of the health care
> workers in attendance at the eighth annual Charles P. Fasano Memorial
> Lecture, Thursday night at Trout Auditorium on the Bucknell University
> campus.
>
> But that was the controversial nature of Dr. David Nash’s one hour talk to
> approximately 175 area medical doctors and administrators. “And many of
> those errors are preventable,” he said. “They should be. As doctors, as
> people in the medical field, we should do no harm.”
>
> Nash was introduced by Maria Fasano Bhandgia, who introduced Nash as
> “someone internationally recognized for his work in public accountability
> for outcomes and quality of care improvement.”
>
> Nash, dean of the Jefferson College of Population Health, in Philadelphia,
> presented the idea that safety practices in hospitals are not taught and
> present dangers to patients, even more so than the actual medical
> procedure, although that can be a problem too.
>
> “It’s long been a well-kept secret in the medical field,” he said “that
> health care is dangerous. For years, those in the field would say, ‘stuff
> happens because what we do is complicated and people get hurt.”
>
> No more is that the case, Nash said. Now there is a public conversation
> about quality and safety in the medical field. “To do no harm is an
> enduring notion. But it is more important today than ever before because
> the tools at our disposal, the technology, the drugs are so incredible. And
> they all carry risks.”
>
> What Nash talked about are preventable medical mistakes. “Certain things
> carry risk that we describe to patients. Cancer chemotherapy, we know, has
> bad side effects. That is not what we are talking about.”
>
> Nash refers to how, “in this country, four times a week, somebody is
> operating on the wrong side of the body, the wrong kidney, the wrong side
> of the brain. That’s a preventable medical mistake.”
>
> He also asked, and answered the question, where are there more errors, in
> a hospital or a doctor’s office?
>
> “Four times as many in a doctor’s office,” Nash said. “And the reasons are
> interesting. The office is a totally failed system because there has never
> really been any compelling need to really study systems in the office
> setting. The good news is most of those errors hardly reach the patient.
> And when they do reach the patient they are not as deadly.”
>
> Some errors, he said are: putting the wrong chart on the door. Wrong
> prescription is a typical office based error. “I know you won’t believe
> this,” he said, “but every American in 2016, had a misdiagnosis or late
> diagnosis when they visited a doctor in an office. Every American.”
>
> Nash is all about bringing attention to system failure, and he is
> optimistic that given the Millennial generation’s demands for transparency,
> hospitals will respond to the need of patients to have more information
> about their own treatment. And hospitals will have to pay a lot of
> attention to their systems, make them safe, collaborate as a team …
> doctors, nurses, other staff.”
>
> “But we have a long way to go on all of that,” said Nash.
>
> *Email comments to rdandes at dailyitem.com <rdandes at dailyitem.com>. Follow
> Dandes on Twitter @rdandes.*
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> ------------------------------
>
>
> To unsubscribe from IMPROVEDX: click the following link:
> http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?
> SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1
>
> or send email to: IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG
>
>
>
> Moderator:David Meyers, Board Member, Society for Improving Diagnosis in
> Medicine
>
> To learn more about SIDM visit:
> http://www.improvediagnosis.org/
>
>






Moderator: David Meyers, Board Member, Society to Improve Diagnosis in Medicine


HTML Version:
URL: <../attachments/20170512/57cab043/attachment.html>


More information about the Test mailing list