dr.xavier.prida at GMAIL.COM
Tue Jun 20 10:42:13 UTC 2017
Indeed, weighted differential diagnosis, with rankings and estimable
probabilities and, likewise with predictable treatment response to
therapies(responders vs non-responders) based on decision tools or grids
would be best practice.
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 8:59 PM, robert bell <rmsbell200 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> I would think not in a very scientific way. But it should be, and
> explained to the patient.
> Doing a study with HCPs on their impression of the frequency of certain
> diseases/conditions in their practice and also in general practice would be
> interesting. The range I suspect would be eye opening.
> A similar study on the length to diagnosis of rarer conditions would also
> be enlightening.
> Should we not be able to get this information now from data bases?
> Rob Bell MD.
> On Jun 3, 2017, at 4:08 AM, Xavier Prida <dr.xavier.prida at GMAIL.COM>
> Is uncertainty allowed for in the expectations of diagnosis and management?
> Assumptions of Quality Medicine- The Role of Uncertainty
> Xavier E. Prida MD FACC FSCAI
> Assistant Professor of Medicine
> Program Director Cardiology Fellowship Training
> USF Morsani College of Medicine
> Department of Cardiovascular Sciences
> 2 Tampa General Circle
> STC 5 th Floor
> Tampa, Fl 33606
> 813 259 0992 <(813)%20259-0992>(O)
> To unsubscribe from IMPROVEDX: click the following link:
> or send email to: IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG
> Moderator:David Meyers, Board Member, Society for Improving Diagnosis in
> To learn more about SIDM visit:
Xavier E. Prida MD FACC FSCAI
Assistant Professor of Medicine
Program Director Cardiology Fellowship Training
USF Morsani College of Medicine
Department of Cardiovascular Sciences
2 Tampa General Circle
STC 5 th Floor
Tampa, Fl 33606
813 259 0992(O)
Moderator: David Meyers, Board Member, Society to Improve Diagnosis in Medicine
More information about the Test