Diagnostic Error associated with screening tests
rmsbell200 at YAHOO.COM
Thu Sep 14 05:19:01 UTC 2017
Does that support the idea that it would be better to first deal with standard medical errors, or even concurrently, when considering diagnostic error planning and goals?
Is it worthwhile and sensible to focus just on diagnostic errors when we work in a big sea of other medical errors?
Rob Bell, M.D.
> On Sep 13, 2017, at 5:56 PM, David Katz <d.katz at MAIL.UTORONTO.CA> wrote:
> Hi Group,
> Some colleagues and myself submitted the following case to the AHRQ WebM&M series. It is a case of SIRS-negative sepsis in an elderly patient.
> The discussion points focus on diagnostic error related to screening tests.
> I thought it might be interesting to the group.
> https://psnet.ahrq.gov/webmm/case/421/failed-interpretation-of-screening-tool-delayed-treatment <https://psnet.ahrq.gov/webmm/case/421/failed-interpretation-of-screening-tool-delayed-treatment>
> David Katz
> M. Sc., M.D., FRCPC
> To unsubscribe from IMPROVEDX: click the following link:
> http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1 <http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1>
> or send email to: IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG <mailto:IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG>
> Visit the searchable archives or adjust your subscription at: http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?INDEX <http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?INDEX>
> Moderator:David Meyers, Board Member, Society for Improving Diagnosis in Medicine
> To learn more about SIDM visit:
> http://www.improvediagnosis.org/ <http://www.improvediagnosis.org/>
Moderator: David Meyers, Board Member, Society to Improve Diagnosis in Medicine
More information about the Test