Is there evidence of racial disparity/inequity in medical diagnosis?
ruth at RYAN-GRAHAM.COM
Fri Oct 13 18:00:53 UTC 2017
You raise a great question.
Does mass screening of asymptomatic people for disease belong in our world of diagnostic safety? Do we own it?
We seem to claim it, at least to the extent of data-mining for unfollowed-up test results.
From: Michael H. Kanter [mailto:Michael.H.Kanter at kp.org]
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2017 12:53 PM
To: Society to Improve Diagnosis in Medicine <IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG>; Ruth Ryan <ruth at ryan-graham.com>
Subject: RE: [IMPROVEDX] Is there evidence of racial disparity/inequity in medical diagnosis?
If one considers screening tests for cancer part of the diagnostic error /reliability issue , there is evidence of differences in cancer screening rates based on race/ethnicity.
From: Ruth Ryan [mailto:ruth at RYAN-GRAHAM.COM]
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2017 6:42 AM
To: IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG<mailto:IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG>
Subject: [IMPROVEDX] Is there evidence of racial disparity/inequity in medical diagnosis?
Caution: This email came from outside Kaiser Permanente. Do not open attachments or click on links if you do not recognize the sender.
There appears to be a lot of evidence for racial/ethnic/gender disparities in medical treatment and outcomes.
We all know diagnosis is the gateway to treatment and outcomes.
So is there evidence for racial disparity/inequity in medical diagnosis?
The Sunday NY Times reiterated the study about job resumes receiving significantly different response rates from employers based on whether they came from a black or a white sounding name. The article reports on a new study of response to simple email queries to public offices (sheriff, library, school district) from back and white sounding names and show an 8-13% higher rate of no-response or less cordial response to inquiries from blacks, worse in more heavily white geographic areas. This was presumed to be due to unconscious bias.
I'm looking for material (studies, articles, writers, speakers) on racial/ethnic/gender disparities related to diagnosis. Or treatment/outcome disparities linked back to diagnosis. Know of any?
Address messages to: IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG<mailto:IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG>
To unsubscribe from IMPROVEDX: click the following link:
or send email to: IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG<mailto:IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG>
Visit the searchable archives or adjust your subscription at: http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?INDEX
Moderator:David Meyers, Board Member, Society for Improving Diagnosis in Medicine
To learn more about SIDM visit:
NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are prohibited from sharing, copying, or otherwise using or disclosing its contents. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and permanently delete this e-mail and any attachments without reading, forwarding or saving them. Thank you.
Moderator: David Meyers, Board Member, Society to Improve Diagnosis in Medicine
More information about the Test