Struck off for missed sepsis
jason.maude at ISABELHEALTHCARE.COM
Wed Dec 13 17:25:19 UTC 2017
This story gives a rather chilling spin on a case of delayed diagnosis of sepsis and subsequent malpractice case in the UK. The GMC (regulates doctors in the UK) has decided the doctor should be struck off but hundreds of doctors have rallied around to her support. Is this a case of doctors closing ranks or has her treatment been unfair punishing her as an individual while there were several systemic issues?
My initial reading reminds me of Captain Sully when the air accident investigators assume that he should have made an instant decision to try and get to La Guardia….
The Daily Mail article gives the background http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5146713/Doctors-rally-against-efforts-strike-Bawa-Garba.html and I have attached the actual Tribunal report.
This blog in the BMJ and article in the New Statesman give a more ‘medical’ view:
Dr Hadiza was obviously under huge pressure that day covering 3 separate units. The hospital later admitted to finding several systemic issues in their investigation. The GMC representative said that she should have had sepsis in mind as a diagnosis. Her initial diagnosis was gastroenteritis.
Is this a case where the clinician was just so busy and couldn’t be expected to do anything else or the health system, knowing that dx mistakes will happen when it’s so busy, should require the clinician to work up a differential?
I have attached 2 screen shots from a DDx tool with first showing the presenting symptoms of ‘diarrhoea, vomiting and difficulty breathing’ and then a 2nd screen shot with the presenting symptoms and the blood gas result showing high lactate. As you see, sepsis appears in 2nd position with just the presenting features and 1st with high lactate.
Does a tool like this help a clinician to be able to think more broadly and clearly while under pressure or does it hinder?
She was clearly under huge pressure so it would obviously be hard to think calmly but a DDx tool that is quick and easy to use could just possibly have triggered her to suspect sepsis which would certainly have changed how she managed the patient subsequently.
So, it’s a question of either too busy to do a DDx or so busy that must do a DDx? What are your views?
Founder and CEO Isabel Healthcare
Tel: +44 1428 644886
Tel: +1 703 879 1890
To unsubscribe from the IMPROVEDX:
mail to:IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG
or click the following link: IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG
Address messages to: IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG
For additional information and subscription commands, visit:
http://LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG/ (with your password)
Visit the searchable archives or adjust your subscription at:
Moderator: David Meyers, Board Member, Society to Improve Diagnosis in Medicine
To unsubscribe from the IMPROVEDX list, click the following link:<br>
<a href="http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1" target="_blank">http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1</a>
Size: 188881 bytes
Name: Screen Shot 2017-12-13 at 12.11.46.png
Size: 124635 bytes
Desc: Screen Shot 2017-12-13 at 12.11.46.png
Name: Screen Shot 2017-12-13 at 12.12.20.png
Size: 129266 bytes
Desc: Screen Shot 2017-12-13 at 12.12.20.png
More information about the Test