Annals of EM Malpractice Editorial
keelcoleman at GMAIL.COM
Thu Feb 15 16:08:52 UTC 2018
Long time reader, first time poster.
Attached find an editorial from Annals of Emergency Medicine regarding a
study of malpractice claims.
*The editorial reviews the current literature looking for three things:*
*1. Are their practice patterns or decisions by EM providers that are
associated with increased likelihood of being named in a suit? *
Answer: No. None that we can find.
*2. Are there identifiers for EM providers that are associate with
likelihood of being named in a suit?*
Answer: Yes. Time in practice (number of years), and number of pts seen.
3. *What other avenues might we study to further understand patterns of
Answer: Look at your local patient-plaintiff attorney relationships.
Given these answers, what can be done to first protect patients from the
wages of defensive medicine, and deranged decision making driven by the
fear of of litigation?
Second, what can be done to support physicians who will certainly find
themselves in the crosshairs of litigation despite doing 'the right thing'
Third, as the study of indemnity claims moves to focus on local variability
of malpractice environments, how do we maintain objectivity and best
practices when a care space becomes adversarial by virtue of its location?
Keel Coleman DO, MBA, FACEP
Moderator: David Meyers, Board Member, Society to Improve Diagnosis in Medicine
To unsubscribe from the IMPROVEDX list, click the following link:<br>
<a href="http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1" target="_blank">http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1</a>
Name: Malpract editorial.pdf
Size: 95035 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Test