Tech Can Turn Doctors into Clerical Workers

Tom Benzoni benzonit at GMAIL.COM
Fri May 25 19:10:50 UTC 2018


Some people explain it better than I:
https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2018/05/25/613685732/why-your-health-insurer-doesnt-care-about-your-big-bills

tom

On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 12:14 PM Tom Benzoni <benzonit at gmail.com> wrote:

> Purely FYI:
> Overhead for commercial insurers = 20%
> "This is commonly called "Medical Loss ratio."
> To read more, search "Medical Loss Ratio" which is interesting.
> What other business has a guaranteed overhead?
> And considering this is insurance, that is double ironic.
>
> And the topic is old!
> See https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM198010233031703 on
> medical-industrial complex; note the date: 1980.
>
> tom
>
> On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 10:56 AM Art Papier <apapier at visualdx.com> wrote:
>
>> Rob,
>>
>> Good question.  Are you sure the “electorate is not ready for a single
>> payer system”?  or could it be that the pharmaceutical industry,
>> hospitals, nursing homes, HCPs, etc do not want a single payer system and
>> work their hardest to create a perception the public is not ready for a
>> single payer system?  Polling data shows the public likes Medicare (“*
>> More than seven in 10 suburban residents say they favor cutting federal
>> spending in general. But when you get specific, 87 percent oppose cutting
>> Social Security and Medicare benefits. And 65 percent support
>> *increasing* government spending on infrastructure and public works
>> projects”.
>> https://www.hofstra.edu/pdf/academics/css/ncss_2012_ncsspoll.pdf)
>>
>>
>>
>> Perhaps we should push for Medicare beginning at age 50. And then slowly
>> move to Medicare for all.  My answer to your question is for all fact and
>> truth based people to work towards electing a congress and senate that will
>> make rational, data driven decisions……  OK so maybe that is delusional to
>> think that might happen……  Medicare has an overhead of 3%, many  estimate
>> private insurers have an overhead of 15%.  This article cites a saving of
>> $350 billion yearly by changing the way we finance healthcare in the US.
>> https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4283267/
>>
>> Art
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* ROBERT M BELL <rmsbell200 at yahoo.com>
>> *Sent:* Saturday, May 19, 2018 7:59 PM
>> *To:* IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG; Art Papier <
>> apapier at visualdx.com>
>> *Subject:* Re: [IMPROVEDX] Tech Can Turn Doctors into Clerical Workers
>>
>>
>>
>> Yes, Art, rid us of Fee for Service and all the expensive bureaucracy
>> that goes with.
>>
>>
>>
>> But if the pharmaceutical industry, hospitals, nursing homes, HCPs, etc.
>> all make fair to good money and the electorate is not ready for a single
>> payer system, how do we put patients back into the the front row seats?
>>
>>
>>
>> Rob
>>
>>
>>
>> On May 19, 2018, at 12:39 PM, Art Papier <apapier at VISUALDX.COM> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> First step is to rid ourselves of fee for service medicine and then the
>> EHR will begin to improve.
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>>
>> To unsubscribe from IMPROVEDX: click the following link:
>>
>> http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1
>> or send email to: IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG
>>
>> Moderator:David Meyers, Board Member, Society for Improving Diagnosis in
>> Medicine
>>
>> To learn more about SIDM visit:
>> http://www.improvediagnosis.org/
>
>






Moderator: David Meyers, Board Member, Society to Improve Diagnosis in Medicine


HTML Version:
URL: <../attachments/20180525/b992d87f/attachment.html>


More information about the Test mailing list