[No SPF Record] [IMPROVEDX] Culture

ROBERT M BELL rmsbell200 at YAHOO.COM
Thu Jun 14 19:54:30 UTC 2018


Thank you so much.

That that gets back to my argument about the importance of hospital culture. Would welcome the article if you can find it.

I am amazed that the authors would say that arrogance caused errors in diagnosis. A massive figure in the scheme of things.

I presume lack of arrogance could be part of culture in a hospital?

While we are waiting for breakthroughs in diagnostic error science, could we focus on culture in hospitals. Just doing more studies could help reduce that 17% figure, if confirmed.

And how many lives and injuries could we save each year if we did that?

Rob Bell

 
> On Jun 14, 2018, at 10:53 AM, NANCY GENN <nancy.genn at comcast.net> wrote:
> 
> There was a study, either Harvard or Johns Hopkins, contrasting PCP's and specialists, along 2 variables, diagnostic accuracy and diagnostic certainty.   Although specialists had a greater degree of accuracy than PCP's, their error rate was still measured very high (I remember it being about 17%), but they were astoundingly certain that their diagnosis had been correct and rejected  the notion that they needed either further objective testing or another opinion (70%).  The interpretation of the researchers was that it was arrogance that contributed to the high rate of diagnostic error.  It was about 5 years ago.  If I find it, I'll send you the citation.
> 
> 
> 
> Nancy Genn
> 
>> On June 14, 2018 at 12:51 PM ROBERT M BELL <0000000296e45ec4-dmarc-request at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG> wrote:
>> 
>> Thanks Tom and Bob,
>> 
>> Is that the the lack of caution that comes with any degree of arrogance?
>> 
>> Does arrogance itself have a role in diagnostic error?
>> 
>> Has that ever been studied?
>> 
>> Does anyone know?
>> 
>> Rob Bell
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Jun 13, 2018, at 8:52 PM, Tom Benzoni <benzonit at GMAIL.COM <mailto:benzonit at GMAIL.COM>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> From 35+ years in the front lines of health care, this is for sure so.
>>> And the arc is increasing.
>>> I've recently moved from an area that always felt a bit inadequate to one that is self-assured.
>>> The prior was much safer than the latter.
>>> Ever hear the phrase "Fat, dumb and happy?"
>>> 
>>> tom benzoni
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 12:26 PM Bob Latino <blatino at reliability.com <mailto:blatino at reliability.com>> wrote:
>>> While this is referencing the Oil & Gas industry, there are some interesting stats related to the 'zero commitments' we were talking about earlier. 
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> "Unsurpirsingly, there is even a correlation between committing to a ‘zero accident’ vision on a project and killing more people. In a thoughtful recent study, British colleagues have demonstrated that projects subject to a ‘zero safety’ policy or program actually slightly increase the likelihood of having a serious life-changing accident or fatality (Sheratt & Dainty, 2017)."
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Just an FYI.  
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> http://www.safetydifferently.com/oil-and-gas-safety-in-a-post-truth-world/#comment-3802 <http://www.safetydifferently.com/oil-and-gas-safety-in-a-post-truth-world/#comment-3802>
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Robert J. Latino, CEO
>>> 
>>> Reliability Center, Inc.
>>> 
>>> 1.800.457.0645
>>> 
>>> blatino at reliability.com <mailto:blatino at reliability.com>
>>> www.reliability.com <http://www.reliability.com/>
>>>  
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> From: Mark Graber [mailto:Mark.Graber at Improvediagnosis.org <mailto:Mark.Graber at Improvediagnosis.org>] 
>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2018 11:07 AM
>>> To: Society to Improve Diagnosis in Medicine <IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG <mailto:IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG>>; Bob Latino <blatino at reliability.com <mailto:blatino at reliability.com>>
>>> Subject: Re: [IMPROVEDX] [No SPF Record] [IMPROVEDX] Culture
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> That Decker article on ‘getting to zero’ is amazing – thanks for forwarding it Bob.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> It was exactly this question, can we get to zero, that prompted my first-ever paper on diagnostic errors, arising from assertions at national meetings that we could completely eliminate serious safety events.   Don Berwick had it right: “The search for zero error rates is doomed from the start”.
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Its also the wrong question; Better questions are:  How can we make progress, and how can we measure that?  And… now with the knowledge that unintended consequences will accompany whatever we do, how do we minimize those while maximizing accuracy, timeliness, and safety? 
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Mark
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Mark L Graber MD FACP
>>> 
>>> President, SIDM
>>> 
>>> Senior Fellow, RTI International
>>> 
>>> Professor Emeritus, Stony Brook University
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>>   
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> From: Bob Latino <blatino at RELIABILITY.COM <mailto:blatino at RELIABILITY.COM>>
>>> Reply-To: Listserv ImproveDx <IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG <mailto:IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG>>, Bob Latino <blatino at RELIABILITY.COM <mailto:blatino at RELIABILITY.COM>>
>>> Date: Tuesday, June 12, 2018 at 10:03 AM
>>> To: Listserv ImproveDx <IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG <mailto:IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG>>
>>> Subject: Re: [IMPROVEDX] [No SPF Record] [IMPROVEDX] Culture
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Along this thread I thought this article may be of interest.  Declarations of 'zero' metrics, often has unintended consequences.  While on the surface they seem logical and admirable, they can suppress feedback loops for fear of affecting the zero metric (such as zero harm). 
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> The article is authored by noted safety researcher Sidney Dekker.
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Does this 'zero' mentality fall into the realm of how success in reducing Dx error is measured?  Is it applicable?
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Regards
>>> 
>>> Bob Latino
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Robert J. Latino, CEO
>>> 
>>> Reliability Center, Inc.
>>> 
>>> 1.800.457.0645
>>> 
>>> blatino at reliability.com <mailto:blatino at reliability.com>
>>> www.reliability.com <http://www.reliability.com/>
>>>  
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> From: Rory Jaffe [mailto:rjaffe at CHPSO.ORG <mailto:rjaffe at CHPSO.ORG>] 
>>> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2018 3:04 PM
>>> To: IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG <mailto:IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG>
>>> Subject: Re: [IMPROVEDX] [No SPF Record] [IMPROVEDX] Culture
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> The other studies show a reasonably strong link.
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Some of the problems in making an overall assessment is that culture is very local, varying broadly from department to department within an organization. Within-organization variability is generally much higher than between-organization vulnerability on safety culture surveys. So studies that look at “culture” in the organization as a whole tend to have weaker results. The specific papers do show a decent link.
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Also backing this conclusion is that, in other industries, this has been studied and there is a definite link between culture and safety.
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> I think there is a consensus in health care that there’s a link. Look at “to err is human” and subsequent publications from the National Academy of Medicine. These publications strongly presume that culture is important driver of safety.
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> From: ROBERT M BELL <rmsbell200 at yahoo.com <mailto:rmsbell200 at yahoo.com>> 
>>> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2018 10:47 AM
>>> To: Society to Improve Diagnosis in Medicine <IMPROVEDX at list.improvediagnosis.org <mailto:IMPROVEDX at list.improvediagnosis.org>>; Rory Jaffe <rjaffe at chpso.org <mailto:rjaffe at chpso.org>>
>>> Subject: Re: [No SPF Record] [IMPROVEDX] Culture
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Thanks Rory Jaffe,
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Very kind.
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Do you yourself have an overall opinion? I looked at the Weaver article which evaluated many studies. and, from my limited interpretation, that did not seem too positive.
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Is there a general consensus amongst the medical profession as to whether culture is important in preventing errors?
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Is to ERR more resistant to intervention than we think?
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Rob Bell
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> On Jun 11, 2018, at 9:58 AM, Rory Jaffe <rjaffe at chpso.org <mailto:rjaffe at chpso.org>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Weaver SJ, Lubomksi LH, Wilson RF, Pfoh ER, Martinez KA, Dy SM. Promoting a culture of safety as a patient safety strategy: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(5 Pt 2):369-374. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-158-5-201303051-00002.
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Address messages to: IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG <mailto:IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG>
>>> 
>>> To unsubscribe from IMPROVEDX: click the following link:
>>> http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1 <http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1>
>>> or send email to: IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG <mailto:IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG>
>>> 
>>> Visit the searchable archives or adjust your subscription at: http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?INDEX <http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?INDEX>
>>> 
>>> Moderator:David Meyers, Board Member, Society for Improving Diagnosis in Medicine
>>> 
>>> To learn more about SIDM visit:
>>> http://www.improvediagnosis.org/ <http://www.improvediagnosis.org/>
>>>  
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Address messages to: IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG <mailto:IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG>
>>> 
>>> To unsubscribe from IMPROVEDX: click the following link:
>>> http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1 <http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1>
>>> or send email to: IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG <mailto:IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG>
>>> 
>>> Visit the searchable archives or adjust your subscription at: http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?INDEX <http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?INDEX>
>>> 
>>> Moderator:David Meyers, Board Member, Society for Improving Diagnosis in Medicine
>>> 
>>> To learn more about SIDM visit:
>>> http://www.improvediagnosis.org/ <http://www.improvediagnosis.org/>
>>> 
>>> Address messages to: IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG <mailto:IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG>
>>> 
>>> To unsubscribe from IMPROVEDX: click the following link:
>>> http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1 <http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1> or send email to: IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG <mailto:IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG>
>>> 
>>> Visit the searchable archives or adjust your subscription at: http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?INDEX <http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?INDEX> 
>>> Moderator:David Meyers, Board Member, Society for Improving Diagnosis in Medicine
>>> 
>>> To learn more about SIDM visit:
>>> http://www.improvediagnosis.org/ <http://www.improvediagnosis.org/>
>>> 
>>> Address messages to: IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG <mailto:IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG>
>>> 
>>> To unsubscribe from IMPROVEDX: click the following link:
>>> http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1 <http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1>
>>> 
>>> or send email to: IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG <mailto:IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG>
>>> 
>>> Visit the searchable archives or adjust your subscription at: http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?INDEX <http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?INDEX>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Moderator:David Meyers, Board Member, Society for Improving Diagnosis in Medicine
>>> 
>>> To learn more about SIDM visit:
>>> http://www.improvediagnosis.org/ <http://www.improvediagnosis.org/>
>>> 
>>> <image002.jpg><image006.jpg><image006.jpg><image003.jpg>
>> 
> 
>  
> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> To unsubscribe from IMPROVEDX: click the following link:
>> http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1 <http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1>
>>  
>> 
>> or send email to: IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG
>> 
>> Visit the searchable archives or adjust your subscription at: http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?INDEX
>>  
>> 
>> 
>> Moderator:David Meyers, Board Member, Society for Improving Diagnosis in Medicine
>> 
>> To learn more about SIDM visit:
>> http://www.improvediagnosis.org/
>>  
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe from IMPROVEDX: click the following link:
> http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1 <http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1>
> 
> or send email to: IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG
> 
> Visit the searchable archives or adjust your subscription at: http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?INDEX
> 
> 
> Moderator:David Meyers, Board Member, Society for Improving Diagnosis in Medicine
> 
> To learn more about SIDM visit:
> http://www.improvediagnosis.org/
> 







Moderator: David Meyers, Board Member, Society to Improve Diagnosis in Medicine


HTML Version:
URL: <../attachments/20180614/8bd933f3/attachment.html>


More information about the Test mailing list