Sens/spec, +/-LRs, PPV/NPVs
Ted E Palen
Ted.E.Palen at KP.ORG
Wed Sep 12 15:43:24 UTC 2018
In discussing sensitivity, specificity, NPV, and PPV you must remember that the equation for each of these values only includes part of the population being tested while LR includes the results of all members of the population being tested.
Notice the Sensitivity calculation only includes the population with the disease/condition while Specificity only includes those without the disease/condition.
The PPV only includes patients testing positive while NPV only includes patients testing negative.
However, the LR+ and the LR- use the entire population, both those with and without the disease/condition and who test positive and test negative, as seen by the equations:
That is why the LR is a more powerful tool, it takes into account the whole population being tested and those with and without disease/condition.
Ted E. Palen, PhD, MD, MSPH
Physician Reviewer Utilization Management Department
Colorado Permanente Medical Group
Institute for Health Research
Kaiser Permanente Colorado
10065 E. Harvard Ave., Suite 300
Denver, CO 80231
Email: Ted.E.Palen at kp.org<mailto:Ted.E.Palen at kp.org>
Assistant: Hilda Medina
Hilda.Medina at kp.org<mailto:Hilda.Medina at kp.org>
From: Tom Yuen <0000001243181998-dmarc-request at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG>
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2018 4:52:51 PM
To: IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG
Subject: Re: [IMPROVEDX] Sens/spec, +/-LRs, PPV/NPVs
Caution: This email came from outside Kaiser Permanente. Do not open attachments or click on links if you do not recognize the sender.
Many thanks to everyone's reply, especially from Dr Brush and John Ely for his thoughtful response.
I think the bottom line that my residents needed to answer was basically if there was any difference and/or advantage between sensitivity/specificity and +LR/-LR. PPV/NPV, as John (Ely) pointed out is dependent on disease prevalence.
But it seems to me, based on everyone's reply is that there doesn't seem to be much PRACTICAL difference between sens/spec and LR. Just different ways of expressing essentially the same thing. (if I have this horribly wrong please correct me as I am giving a followup lecture Thursday and will be addressing the questions they have last week!)
Essentially a test with a high +LR and a high specificity- if positive in a patient with a moderate pretest prob of a disease, dramatically increases your posttest prob of them truly having the disease. I think my residents were struggling (as was I) with whether it mattered which statistic (LR vs. spec/sens) we looked at- and it doesn't seem to matter.
Thank you again everyone, while I am a first-time poster I have been following this listserv for years and am humbled by the collective wisdom assembled here.
Tom Yuen, MD
To unsubscribe from IMPROVEDX: click the following link:
or send email to: IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG
Visit the searchable archives or adjust your subscription at: http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?INDEX<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__list.improvediagnosis.org_scripts_wa-2DIMPDIAG.exe-3FINDEX&d=DwQFaQ&c=ZMR5nv7DeMA_5yIzV7zEdkSfOjTGya0xwGqp1JcaTq0&r=x3Zjke4ixwc7ViJqrO93EyORZnJpbwGpwvQd8OB7AmI&m=w9Wc8bULSRxu7cuHIh1PPwYmiyV_sQBO3Pfss20-LTw&s=qOXZTVzB8PlB8EZ1AoPKwapReNV3AzE2FjNg6mDF6xs&e=>
Moderator:David Meyers, Board Member, Society for Improving Diagnosis in Medicine
To learn more about SIDM visit:
NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are prohibited from sharing, copying, or otherwise using or disclosing its contents. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and permanently delete this e-mail and any attachments without reading, forwarding or saving them. Thank you.
Moderator: David Meyers, Board Member, Society to Improve Diagnosis in Medicine
Size: 28129 bytes
Size: 9465 bytes
More information about the Test