Errors in diagnosis and a possible way forward.

Edward Hoffer ehoffer at GMAIL.COM
Wed Nov 28 14:09:43 UTC 2018


Agree entirely that working towards single-payer (which I whole-heartedly
support and advocate in my book) is WAY beyond scope of diagnostic error -
and frankly would have minimal impact.  The payment mechanism introduces
many behaviors that are antithetical to optimal care, but not sure
diagnostic error is one of them.
Just as the "surgical time-out" has become standard of care in the
operating room, a "diagnostic time-out" needs to become standard of care in
the consultation room.
Ed
Edward P Hoffer MD, FACP, FACC

On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 8:20 AM Jason Maude <
jason.maude at isabelhealthcare.com> wrote:

> Rob
>
> You are still trying to address some almost insurmountable issues like a
> single payor system.
>
>
>
> My view has always been that our missing final link is a measure that
> regulators can use. They may agree with everything we say and want to
> include something on diagnosis but need a measure to make it happen. We
> have spent too long talking about perfect measures and just need 3 (or even
> one!) that we can agree on and are practical. Hence my long-standing
> suggestion that the recording of a differential diagnosis in the notes
> should become a requirement. It makes clinical sense and will be easy to
> implement and measure if one is present or not.
>
>
>
> This small but important measure could start to drive a huge change in
> behaviour.
>
>
>
> An historical example is the abolition of the slave trade in the UK. This
> was finally achieved via an obscure change in legislation that removed
> protection for ships flying under the then neutral US flag. It meant that
> within 2-3 years 80% of the operators in the UK went out of business and
> then abolition by parliament became easy. The lesson is this seemingly
> small technical change achieved what 20 years of head on battling had
> failed to achieve!
>
>
>
> Regards
>
> Jason
>
>
>
> *From: *Robert Bell <
> 0000000296e45ec4-dmarc-request at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG>
> *Reply-To: *Society to Improve Diagnosis in Medicine <
> IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG>, Robert Bell <rmsbell200 at YAHOO.COM>
> *Date: *Tuesday, 27 November 2018 at 23:13
> *To: *"IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG" <
> IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG>
> *Subject: *[IMPROVEDX] Errors in diagnosis and a possible way forward.
>
>
>
>
>
> Dear all
>
>
>
> I could be wrong but it seems that the problems relating to errors in
> diagnosis are so massive that any health organization/Society that tries to
> do something gets mired in the weeds with little eventually happening.
>
>
>
> It would seem that that it would be good to tackle one thing at time in a
> significant way and succeed at something.
>
>
>
> Also, the piece by Mike Posata is a good example of the influence of money
> on errors.
>
>
>
> My top three areas for research would be:
>
>    - Supporting a single payer system, like most of the developed world
>    already has, and investigating the benefits of a single payer system in
>    preventing errors in diagnosis.
>    That would remove so many hurdles we do not need in medicine. A big
>    challenge but collaboratively, I think, could be done.
>    - Identifying the very commonest errors in diagnosis in each
>    specialty, and working hard on those to prevent them - pulmonary medicine
>    would be my first.
>    - Clarifying all the issues regarding laboratory tests, including,
>    ordering, reporting, interpretation, and subsequent action.
>
> My basic message is to tackle something that is likely to produce results,
> and can be completed in a defined period of time with the available
> resources.
>
>
>
> Comments very welcome.
>
>
>
> Rob Bell, M.D.
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from IMPROVEDX: click the following link:
>
> http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1
>
> or send email to: IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG
>
>
>
> Moderator:David Meyers, Board Member, Society for Improving Diagnosis in
> Medicine
>
> To learn more about SIDM visit:
> http://www.improvediagnosis.org/
>
> ------------------------------
>
>
> To unsubscribe from IMPROVEDX: click the following link:
>
> http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1
> or send email to: IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG
>
> Moderator:David Meyers, Board Member, Society for Improving Diagnosis in
> Medicine
>
> To learn more about SIDM visit:
> http://www.improvediagnosis.org/






Moderator: David Meyers, Board Member, Society to Improve Diagnosis in Medicine

To unsubscribe from the IMPROVEDX list, click the following link:<br>
<a href="http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1" target="_blank">http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1</a>
</p>

HTML Version:
URL: <../attachments/20181128/8b973f21/attachment.html>


More information about the Test mailing list