White paper on inappropriate laboratory testing

Jason Maude jason.maude at ISABELHEALTHCARE.COM
Thu Feb 21 12:57:50 UTC 2019


This is a great study. I was amazed that the rate of abnormal test results for the Calgary physicians was just 9% and even lower than my long held wild guesstimate!

If clinicians had to record what they suspected before ordering a test wouldn’t that both stimulate thinking at a good moment and significantly improve appropriateness of ordering?

Dare I suggest, but could the level of abnormal test results also be another good proxy measure for diagnosis (along with presence of a DDx)?

Regards
Jason

Jason Maude
Founder and CEO Isabel Healthcare
Tel: +44 1428 644886
Tel: +1 703 879 1890
www.isabelhealthcare.com<http://www.isabelhealthcare.com/>


From: Mark Gusack <gusackm at COMCAST.NET>
Reply-To: Society to Improve Diagnosis in Medicine <IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG>, "gusackm at COMCAST.NET" <gusackm at COMCAST.NET>
Date: Monday, 18 February 2019 at 22:56
To: "IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG" <IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG>
Subject: Re: [IMPROVEDX] White paper on inappropriate laboratory testing

Good Evening Mark:

The C.D. Howe Institute report on laboratory testing is, in my opinion, one of the best I’ve seen.  I’ve done a number of similar studies at a variety of healthcare institutions over the past 35 years and have always found what is very well illustrated on page 14 of the report.  That plot shows that a small number of physicians greatly overutilize the laboratory along with a moderate number of physicians who moderately over utilize the laboratory.  I’ve had the opportunity to reign this sort of behavior in and have discovered to my chagrin that the highest utilizers are often the most well connected politically or financially to the institution making it very difficult to modify their behavior.

However…on two occasions I was also well connected politically.  In both cases the worst offenders were forced to change their behavior.

In one case, a small rural hospital had lost over 600 thousand dollars in the prior year and was nearing bankruptcy.  The medical director was a close friend and fully supported my offer to look at the laboratory ordering trends for each physician.  The result?  Just one physician – a family practitioner – was costing the hospital over 200 thousand dollars in unnecessary testing and blood utilization.  This was eliminated but only after a very vocal ‘argument’ during a medical executive meeting.  After getting I convinced the ED physician to change behavior another 150 thousand dollars were saved.  That is over half the hospital deficit.  Two doctors.  Just two…

In the other case, as a resident, I was tasked with finding out why over a million dollars in laboratory tests were being ordered every year by just one ward.  As surgical ward?!  I discovered that a former physician had set up a very expensive laboratory testing panel as part of a clinical investigation slated for eventual publication.  It required the hiring of at least five additional technologists, the installation of additional laboratory equipment, and all the rest of the expenses of doing the tests.  He left the hospital six years earlier less than one year into the study.  No one had bothered to continue the study nor had anyone had the presence of mind to cancel the study testing protocol.

I reported my findings to my department director and he told me to go back to the ward and remove the standing testing orders (this was in the good old days before eHR’s).  It turned that out earlier efforts to do this by prior pathologists had failed.  None had been willing to stand up to the ward personnel.  And I found out why.  There was massive blowback with accusations that I was trying to harm the patients.  Soon after, I found myself in front of the hospital CEO with two physicians and three nurses from the ward all yelling at me simultaneously.  Thankfully, the CEO had the presence of mind to realize my position was the correct one.  He severely chastise my opponents and ordered them to stop.  Who knows how long the hemorrhaging would have gone on if this hadn’t happened.

I have dozens of other similar experiences where I was not successful in reigning in unnecessary and even dangerous laboratory testing due to a variety of political, prejudicial, and financial reasons.  If one adds in unnecessary radiologic and surgical procedures done each year in the U.S. you have an enormous amount of valuable resources being wasted when they could be used to pay for the implementation of better diagnostic methods and to cover more people with high quality healthcare.

Mark Gusack, M.D.
President
MANX Enterprises, Ltd.
304 521-1980
www.manxenterprises.com<http://www.manxenterprises.com>

From: Mark Graber <Mark.Graber at IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG>
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2019 1:48 PM
To: IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG
Subject: [IMPROVEDX] White paper on inappropriate laboratory testing

FYI…..

Attached is an authoritative report just issued from the Howe Institute on inappropriate lab testing in Canada.

The report estimates the magnitude of inappropriate over- and under-utilization, and provides advice on how to improve more appropriate test ordering going forward.


Mark L Graber MD FACP
Chief Medical Officer; Founder and President Emeritus, SIDM
Professor Emeritus, Stony Brook University, NY
[cid:image002.jpg at 01D4C7B3.74ED2900]

________________________________

Address messages to: IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG<mailto:IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG>

To unsubscribe from IMPROVEDX: click the following link:
http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1
or send email to: IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG<mailto:IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG>

Visit the searchable archives or adjust your subscription at: http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?INDEX

Moderator:David Meyers, Board Member, Society for Improving Diagnosis in Medicine

To learn more about SIDM visit:
http://www.improvediagnosis.org/

________________________________

Address messages to: IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG

To unsubscribe from IMPROVEDX: click the following link:
http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1
or send email to: IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG

Visit the searchable archives or adjust your subscription at: http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?INDEX

Moderator:David Meyers, Board Member, Society for Improving Diagnosis in Medicine

To learn more about SIDM visit:
http://www.improvediagnosis.org/

To unsubscribe from the IMPROVEDX:
mail to:IMPROVEDX-SIGNOFF-REQUEST at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG
or click the following link: IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG

Address messages to: IMPROVEDX at LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG

For additional information and subscription commands, visit:
http://www.lsoft.com/resources/faq.asp#4A

http://LIST.IMPROVEDIAGNOSIS.ORG/ (with your password)

Visit the searchable archives or adjust your subscription at:
http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?INDEX

Moderator: David Meyers, Board Member, Society to Improve Diagnosis in Medicine

To unsubscribe from the IMPROVEDX list, click the following link:<br>
<a href="http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1" target="_blank">http://list.improvediagnosis.org/scripts/wa-IMPDIAG.exe?SUBED1=IMPROVEDX&A=1</a>
</p>

HTML Version:
URL: <../attachments/20190221/aaa2902c/attachment.html> ATTACHMENT:
Name: image001.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 6664 bytes Desc: image001.jpg URL: <../attachments/20190221/aaa2902c/attachment.jpg>


More information about the Test mailing list